Live data from Hacker News

Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

codeberg.org

81–90 of 402 posts

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#81

The not needing an account is obviously not minor, but honestly, the UI is just better , by a lot . I made a twitter account a while ago using one of those throw away email address sites, so I have an account that I don't care about that I can use for twitter....but the experience just sucks. I don't know how any stands it, even if they don't mind needing an account.

The X app loads posts much faster than these sites, so I find the app has a better UI.

[deleted]

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#82
post #37

The not needing an account is obviously not minor, but honestly, the UI is just better , by a lot . I made a twitter account a while ago using one of those throw away email address sites, so I have an account that I don't care about that I can use for twitter....but the experience just sucks. I don't know how any stands it, even if they don't mind needing an account.

The UI/UX is the main thing. I technically have an X-Twitter account that I rarely use, but loading plain HTML with a bit of JS beats loading a whole SPA experience just to read a post.

1:1 the same thing with Github

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#83

The not needing an account is obviously not minor, but honestly, the UI is just better , by a lot . I made a twitter account a while ago using one of those throw away email address sites, so I have an account that I don't care about that I can use for twitter....but the experience just sucks. I don't know how any stands it, even if they don't mind needing an account.

Yeah, the UI is the real and only reason to use Nitter. It's a very similar situation with old reddit.

Since a couple of weeks they force you to login to use old.reddit.

My visits have dropped by about 95%

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#84

The not needing an account is obviously not minor, but honestly, the UI is just better , by a lot . I made a twitter account a while ago using one of those throw away email address sites, so I have an account that I don't care about that I can use for twitter....but the experience just sucks. I don't know how any stands it, even if they don't mind needing an account.

Shows the true cost of surveillance capitalism.

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#87
post #82
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The UI/UX is the main thing. I technically have an X-Twitter account that I rarely use, but loading plain HTML with a bit of JS beats loading a whole SPA experience just to read a post.

1:1 the same thing with Github

Nithub when?

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's great. My feed is people posting tech/AI news, scientific publications, videos of rockets and self-driving cars, things made with coding agents etc. It's full of people who do meaningful work as well and you can see who they are. Dark mode, ability to easily copy images, link to posts, see posts of interesting people by going to their profile. On top of that the feed algorithm is open source and actually…

[flagged]

I'm a nostr user first and X is lurk only but I seldomly see anything by or about Musk and so does everyone else I speak to who actually uses it.

I suspect this has become more of a meme by Mastodon/Bluesky users than anything real.

Post reply on HN