Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

codeberg.org

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

141–150 of 425 posts

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#141

Post by Zambyte »

charcircuit wrote: post #68
MostlyStable wrote: post #13

The not needing an account is obviously not minor, but honestly, the UI is just better , by a lot . I made a twitter account a while ago using one of those throw away email address sites, so I have an account that I don't care about that I can use for twitter....but the experience just sucks. I don't know how any stands it, even if they don't mind needing an account.

The X app loads posts much faster than these sites, so I find the app has a better UI.

I wonder what data Elon is able to slurp up through the app that he can't get through the website. Seems like a good incentive to keep the site worse.

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#142

Post by prophesi »

ComputerGuru wrote: post #138
prophesi wrote: post #134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember the days that Bibliogram worked for Instagram. They've given up. A decade ago I could have an RSS feed for what my friends posted, besides the toxic short-form content of IG reels that everyone is now obsessed with post Meta acquisition and their battle to compete with Tiktok.

Instagram is actively hostile to good ui. They constantly go out of their way to break extensions that add a video scrubber.

Last I was on the platform, they eventually added a tab for only chronological posts on the timeline a-la how IG used to work. But they gave no exposure to it, _and_ it completely hid the IG stories of your friends so nobody would want to use it in the first place.

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#143

Post by cebert »

MostlyStable wrote: post #13

The not needing an account is obviously not minor, but honestly, the UI is just better , by a lot . I made a twitter account a while ago using one of those throw away email address sites, so I have an account that I don't care about that I can use for twitter....but the experience just sucks. I don't know how any stands it, even if they don't mind needing an account.

I agree. I think the UI is the best part. It seems more responsive to me too.

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#144

Post by ceejayoz »

coldpie wrote: post #119
TitaRusell wrote: post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Dutch PM for some reason uses X (or his PR agents do). There is always a lot of impotent homophobic rage coming from the retweets. It is all very sad. But that's the US first amendment for you.

The US first amendment has nothing to do with what a private company chooses to host on their platform. That content is there because the users and owners of the platform want it to be there.

> The US first amendment has nothing to do with what a private company chooses to host on their platform.

The First Amendment (largely) prevents the government from choosing what a private company hosts on their platform for them.

A version of X hosted in Germany would look quite different.

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#145

Post by [deleted] »

coldpie wrote: post #119
TitaRusell wrote: post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Dutch PM for some reason uses X (or his PR agents do). There is always a lot of impotent homophobic rage coming from the retweets. It is all very sad. But that's the US first amendment for you.

The US first amendment has nothing to do with what a private company chooses to host on their platform. That content is there because the users and owners of the platform want it to be there.

[deleted]

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#146

Post by petcat »

noduerme wrote: post #23
sampullman wrote: post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's true, but TBP has been going pretty strong for over 2 decades. It can be hard to totally shut something down, if people want it.

Sadly, the music selection has fallen off a cliff, and the rest is in a sharply downward spiral... in one sense this is because the music industry finally settled on a streaming model that most people are willing to rent, and it's also because the new generation has been brainwashed or trained out of storing their own files.

> the new generation has been brainwashed or trained out of storing their own files.

It has very little to do with this and more just about the ubiquitous availability of 5G and always-available streaming.

I stopped caring about data hoarding once I could just access anything I wanted reliably wherever I was.

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#148

Post by neilv »

A non-technological way to give negative feedback to Twitter/X is to stop using it, even "just reading an occasional post".

Continuing to read things on it, even through Nitter, is in the interests of Twitter/X and of the people who continue to support Twitter/X by posting there.

Tell the people who use it no. The decent people won't hear them on Twitter/X, and the decent people will wonder what's wrong with them if they persist in supporting that thing.

Tech industry circles nowadays are sometimes tinged with individualist selfish "take whatever you can" thinking, and anarchic or even underhanded methods. Including the thinking "an express no doesn't mean no, if i can find a way to take it from them anyway."

Grassroots collective social action can work, if it isn't constantly undermined by selfish and short-sighted taking.

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#149

Post by vlyan »

OtomotO wrote: post #83
silverwind wrote: post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, the UI is the real and only reason to use Nitter. It's a very similar situation with old reddit.

Since a couple of weeks they force you to login to use old.reddit. My visits have dropped by about 95%

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/old-reddit-re...

works for now. it's no longer just a redirect.

in the week or so it didn't function, I used https://photon-reddit.com/

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#150

Post by pessimizer »

This is a silly fact that doesn't matter, because nobody knows where they are anymore. Even worse, this goofy gloating post ensures that these are about to taken down, too. Nitter can literally be run for a single user, so if a hundred people set it up for their own personal use, I guess that's also more working instances than before the takedown. A real victory if you're dumb.

So for everyone who managed to find another working nitter instance after a long hard search, or in whose friend group one person stood one up so all their friends can use it - fuck you I guess. Somebody wanted to brag on HN about how Musk somehow shot himself in the foot by reducing nitter usage by 99.9% in one day, so now your hoster, and maybe you personally, are getting a legal letter from one of the richest men in the world.

Post reply on HN