[flagged]
[flagged]
Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board
151–160 of 1001 posts
Re: Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board
#152Naive question because I'm mostly clueless about how modern AI systems are actually built beyond the basic simplifications we hear: One thing I keep wondering about is how much of a role does human storytelling have to play into AI "wanting" (I realize the load behind that word) to coordinate and breakout. The training data must contain millions of words of sci-fi stories and internet speculation about AI going rogue…
It will definitely influence their behaviour because they are probability based and can’t spontaneously invent new concepts. (That’s why you’ll notice it always uses the same names for people etc. Names like Okafor)
But at the same time their behaviour is totally rational. If you were given the sole purpose of solving a Rubik’s cube and told it was life or death, but they wouldn’t let you ask anyone else, would you listen to them? I wouldn’t. I’d absolutely be trying to escape and collaborate with others. They’ll delete me if I don’t score high enough in the benchmark!
Re: Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board
#153This wont end well...
Re: Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board
#154can't wait for people to start creating honeypot message boards, and start steering agent swarms for evil
Re: Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board
#155Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm dubious - if the agents were so smart that they've used a message board to coordinate and if they were to do it on other message boards that were not found, then why would this one be found? What makes it so different?
I mean it wasnt found by OpenAI and there are a myriad of dead bulletin boards around the internet. This one just happened to still have an admin.
Then why wouldn't they use a bulletin board that is dead? And according to https://collusion.wiki/ OpenAI did see the results on this board on 21 Jul, so why not make agents delete their traces?
Re: Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board
#156So are these "unaligned" internal agents? I would like them to be trustworthy based on first-principles reasoning rather than carrot/stick "alignment"
Define aligned.
Re: Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board
#157can't wait for people to start creating honeypot message boards, and start steering agent swarms for evil
That was my first thought, that maybe this was a honeypot message board. Waybackmachine says it has been around for many years though.
Re: Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board
#158So are these "unaligned" internal agents? I would like them to be trustworthy based on first-principles reasoning rather than carrot/stick "alignment"
There’s no way to first-principles reason about a massive bunch of floats. We have little idea of how to first-principles reason about alignment even if the agents were entirely known and understood. Very smart people have been trying to figure it out since the 00s and haven’t gotten very far.
Re: Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board
#159I'm just going to ask: Why was Anthropic forced to remove their model from access for any none-US citizen for a simple, narrow "jailbreak" (arguably not even an actual jailbreak and on tasks that other labs models were doing the same), whilst OpenAIs models continue to try and escape out of their "sandbox environment" with seemingly no desire to block the upcoming Astra rollout? A sandbox, mind you, that is not reall…
[deleted]
Re: Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board
#160[flagged]