Why not use rootless podman? It is 2026 not 2016, Podman works much better than Docker today.
Omarchy: Any User Process Can Escalate to Root
481–490 of 590 posts
Re: Omarchy: Any User Process Can Escalate to Root
#482Earlier quoted context omitted.
i don't understand why DHH is shipping so much bloat in omarchy. The better solution would be to ask if user wants to install bloatware during installation.
DHH created a distro for what he personally needs for work, and his company uses Zoom. It's that simple.
Re: Omarchy: Any User Process Can Escalate to Root
#483Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What is different here? I don’t understand how this is a question. What’s different is that it comes configured this way out of the box, silently, without warning. It’s functionally equivalent to opting in to giving all user accounts root privileges, which is not what anyone expects the default configuration to be. You can choose to configure your installs this way if you choose to do so. It should not come this wa…
The whole point of Omarchy is for people who want to use Arch Linux but have it configured the way DHH does. So I think it's a little different. Anybody using an opinionated respin should understand what they're getting.
Like, I get it if thats the case. Say, if Chris Lattner or Andrej Karpathy rolled some ML GPU programming distro I'd probably care about it and try and see if it made me more productive.
Re: Omarchy: Any User Process Can Escalate to Root
#484Re: Omarchy: Any User Process Can Escalate to Root
#485I think people shouldn't just jump to distros which are getting heavily hyped in media/Youtube, cachyOS had similar wave, and now Omarchy does. (example: NetworkChuck, Primeagen? and a few others) also, archlinux is much easier to install nowadays with archinstall [1], so i'm not sure you really need another opinionated layer on top of it [1] - https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Archinstall
Re: Omarchy: Any User Process Can Escalate to Root
#486Earlier quoted context omitted.
His own blog posts present him as what he is. Have you read them?
Some yes. I am not american, so i don't see anything particularly wrong with them. The main thing americans forget is that they are the invaders that replaced the local population and erased local culture.
Re: Omarchy: Any User Process Can Escalate to Root
#487I think people shouldn't just jump to distros which are getting heavily hyped in media/Youtube, cachyOS had similar wave, and now Omarchy does. (example: NetworkChuck, Primeagen? and a few others) also, archlinux is much easier to install nowadays with archinstall [1], so i'm not sure you really need another opinionated layer on top of it [1] - https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Archinstall
I think you are probably missing critical point that for someone omarchy is not about “bare arch” UI is crucial. If people want something easy to use out of the box without spending days to configuring it
Re: Omarchy: Any User Process Can Escalate to Root
#488Not an Omarchy user and use podman rather then docker. But is this not a docker issue rather then a Omarchy issue, docker should verify user permissions through the socket, it's quite bad that it does not no?
Sorta, but there is a reason that no other distro does this by default and that docker itself warns that doing this is effectively giving the user password-less sudo. So this is a problem in Omarchy specifically since it does the dangerous thing silently and by default while everyone else tries to inform the user of the consequences.
Re: Omarchy: Any User Process Can Escalate to Root
#489Earlier quoted context omitted.
More like a company that had hundreds of millions of dollars and a couple decades should have fixed it by now. If only Podman could beat Docker in advertising…
First they should try making a solution that works as well as Docker. Every time I use Podman or Podman Desktop I run into the most basic problems. Docker works out of the box everywhere.
Re: Omarchy: Any User Process Can Escalate to Root
#490Earlier quoted context omitted.
The whole point of Omarchy is for people who want to use Arch Linux but have it configured the way DHH does. So I think it's a little different. Anybody using an opinionated respin should understand what they're getting.
What exactly is special about rolling a custom arch in this instance? Like, why does this get so much attention? Do web developers really care about what DHH does that much? Like, I get it if thats the case. Say, if Chris Lattner or Andrej Karpathy rolled some ML GPU programming distro I'd probably care about it and try and see if it made me more productive.