Live data from Hacker News

Defrag98: Windows 98 Disk Defragmenter Simulator Online

defrag98.com

71–79 of 79 posts

Re: Defrag98: Windows 98 Disk Defragmenter Simulator Online

#71

Perhaps it's appropriate for me to link to the free game I made where you play a taxi driving through Disk Defragmenter and delivering stray blocks of data to their final locations: https://safetystoatstudios.itch.io/ddr . It was pretty fun to watch Defragmenter as a kid, but it would have been better if it was interactive, kind of like the 3D maze screensaver.

Brilliant. Now we need a crazy taxi and GTA version where you cause mayhem trying to steal or return blocks.

Re: Defrag98: Windows 98 Disk Defragmenter Simulator Online

#72
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree. It may sound elitist but back then you need to understand a few concepts to use a computer. From simple things like a filesystem (folders, file, different file types, things my 19 years old nephew don't know), to how to install software, how to download software (!) and then things even a bit more technical: an operative system, how it works, booting, drivers, etc. Now everything is just easier (which is bet…

I've said the same thing about using Linux. 20 years ago if somebody told you they used Linux it really meant something - they weren't running WSL, they weren't running a VM in EC2, they probably didn't power on and immediately have things working, and they probably learned a ton just getting to a login screen for the first time. Spinning up a VM just doesn't give the same learning experience.

You had to recompile a kernel module to support your dang modem and network card or no networking. X11 was a royal pain cuz there was no it just works desktops.

Package mgmt was a nightmare and dependency based managers like yellow dogs APT and nonexistent redhats rpm didn't exist.

More like than not you had to compile some random a55 tarball from src and hoped ./configure && make && make all would work or spend hours on USENET looking for solutions (or mailing lists!).

Re: Defrag98: Windows 98 Disk Defragmenter Simulator Online

#74

Norton Speed Disk [1] for DOS was more satisfying to watch because it would visualize reads and writes. So you'd see it grab blocks and then smush them together into contiguous areas. The Windows version was not, as I recall, as satisfying. [1] https://youtu.be/-T712Wbc6a0

You should see Norton Speed Disk for Windows defrag a DriveSpace volume! It's two step process.

Re: Defrag98: Windows 98 Disk Defragmenter Simulator Online

#75

What were the major filesystem technology improvements that made this redundant?

FAT32 allocates the first free block. IIRC, file order must match disk order because reasons. Ext2 prioritized allocating the middle of free space to allow fragment-free growth on both sides and it became a standard filesystem feature after that.

[deleted]

Re: Defrag98: Windows 98 Disk Defragmenter Simulator Online

#77

Norton Speed Disk [1] for DOS was more satisfying to watch because it would visualize reads and writes. So you'd see it grab blocks and then smush them together into contiguous areas. The Windows version was not, as I recall, as satisfying. [1] https://youtu.be/-T712Wbc6a0

Speed Disk for Mac was even better because it used fun colors and _really_ showed things moving around. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUKvTe1q7CE

Re: Defrag98: Windows 98 Disk Defragmenter Simulator Online

#78

What were the major filesystem technology improvements that made this redundant?

Pretty sure it was really just smarter filesystems that avoid and/or reduce fragmentation automatically: just be a bit more clever about where you place things, and reorganise/optimise things automatically and silently in the background.

Such things did exist back in the day, but they were relatively expensive to run since they had to run all the time. There was one that I used to run back in the 90s when windows was a thing. I think maybe it was diskeeper but I'm not sure.

Post reply on HN