Perhaps it's appropriate for me to link to the free game I made where you play a taxi driving through Disk Defragmenter and delivering stray blocks of data to their final locations: https://safetystoatstudios.itch.io/ddr . It was pretty fun to watch Defragmenter as a kid, but it would have been better if it was interactive, kind of like the 3D maze screensaver.
Defrag98: Windows 98 Disk Defragmenter Simulator Online
71–79 of 79 posts
Re: Defrag98: Windows 98 Disk Defragmenter Simulator Online
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree. It may sound elitist but back then you need to understand a few concepts to use a computer. From simple things like a filesystem (folders, file, different file types, things my 19 years old nephew don't know), to how to install software, how to download software (!) and then things even a bit more technical: an operative system, how it works, booting, drivers, etc. Now everything is just easier (which is bet…
I've said the same thing about using Linux. 20 years ago if somebody told you they used Linux it really meant something - they weren't running WSL, they weren't running a VM in EC2, they probably didn't power on and immediately have things working, and they probably learned a ton just getting to a login screen for the first time. Spinning up a VM just doesn't give the same learning experience.
Package mgmt was a nightmare and dependency based managers like yellow dogs APT and nonexistent redhats rpm didn't exist.
More like than not you had to compile some random a55 tarball from src and hoped ./configure && make && make all would work or spend hours on USENET looking for solutions (or mailing lists!).
Re: Defrag98: Windows 98 Disk Defragmenter Simulator Online
#73Re: Defrag98: Windows 98 Disk Defragmenter Simulator Online
#74Norton Speed Disk [1] for DOS was more satisfying to watch because it would visualize reads and writes. So you'd see it grab blocks and then smush them together into contiguous areas. The Windows version was not, as I recall, as satisfying. [1] https://youtu.be/-T712Wbc6a0
Re: Defrag98: Windows 98 Disk Defragmenter Simulator Online
#75What were the major filesystem technology improvements that made this redundant?
FAT32 allocates the first free block. IIRC, file order must match disk order because reasons. Ext2 prioritized allocating the middle of free space to allow fragment-free growth on both sides and it became a standard filesystem feature after that.
Re: Defrag98: Windows 98 Disk Defragmenter Simulator Online
#76Re: Defrag98: Windows 98 Disk Defragmenter Simulator Online
#77Norton Speed Disk [1] for DOS was more satisfying to watch because it would visualize reads and writes. So you'd see it grab blocks and then smush them together into contiguous areas. The Windows version was not, as I recall, as satisfying. [1] https://youtu.be/-T712Wbc6a0
Re: Defrag98: Windows 98 Disk Defragmenter Simulator Online
#78What were the major filesystem technology improvements that made this redundant?
Such things did exist back in the day, but they were relatively expensive to run since they had to run all the time. There was one that I used to run back in the 90s when windows was a thing. I think maybe it was diskeeper but I'm not sure.