Live data from Hacker News

US Government designates host of noblogs.org a "global terrorist"

crimethinc.com

191–194 of 194 posts

Re: US Government designates host of noblogs.org a "global terrorist"

#191
post #183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes. The Palestine Action bit is in the government complaint not the article. My point was the article glosses over or doesn't mention the actual reasons the government cites. ( https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0616 discussed https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49451343 )

Why should it cite them? They're just excuses.

If you want to understand a situation it sometimes makes sense to state the facts?

Re: US Government designates host of noblogs.org a "global terrorist"

#192
post #191

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why should it cite them? They're just excuses.

If you want to understand a situation it sometimes makes sense to state the facts?

You mean the excuses.

Maybe. But I don't think so. It literally doesn't matter what reasons the government said, and the reasons the government said have no relation to facts or reality. What does matter is that the government doesn't like this group and put them on a certain list.

Re: US Government designates host of noblogs.org a "global terrorist"

#193
post #183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lmao the Italian blogging platform has nothing to do with Palestine Action, did you even read the article? Or do you even pay attention? "Far left" has been illegal in the past and trump clearly wants it so again

Yes. The Palestine Action bit is in the government complaint not the article. My point was the article glosses over or doesn't mention the actual reasons the government cites. ( https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0616 discussed https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49451343 )

And the reason given for the Italian collective was their far left politics...

Re: US Government designates host of noblogs.org a "global terrorist"

#194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right? It's really concerning how much traction "ZOG" seems to be getting. It's literally true that most of the US government is Zionist. But "Zionist-Occupied Government" is an antisemitic conspiracy theory used by white supremacists with specific and incorrect beliefs about how Zionism works in the US and how it formed into what we're all facing today. At least flat-earthers get a useful locally-true approximation…

Is "ZOG" not a locally-true approximation of the shape of the USG?

"Locally true" doesn't help when you need to deal with a much larger-scoped problem, right?. "ZOG" locally suceeds at making you feel like you've got it all figured out, but it's self defeating in the bigger picture. Talk about AIPAC all day long. Talk about congress critters of all political stripes tacitly approving Grump's Iran debacle. Talk about how Epstein seems to have been a politically protected honey trap operation. Talk about Israeli intelligence's well established pattern of no-holds-barred meddling in other countries.

... but balling that all up into "ZOG" just gives one a simplistic rabbit hole where "everything clicks" (ie it proves too much), and mostly written off by anyone else. And if it were to start being widely accepted, it will just fuel a reactionary dumpster fire like every broad-brush populist message inevitably does.

Post reply on HN