Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

391–400 of 528 posts

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#391

Post by zxspectrum1982 »

I use Cursor at work and love it. It's a great IDE, the best IMHO. But it becomes really expensive.

Since the introduction of the Cursor Token Rate, my company tells us to use Claude and Codex directly with Anthropic (or Vertex AI) and OpenAI, respectively.

https://cursor.com/docs/models-and-pricing#cursor-token-rate

I'm now using Grok 4.6 most of the time. Sonnet some times. But that's it. Cursor-native models 99% of the time. I'm pretty sure Anthropic will follow OpenAI soon in pulling their models out of Cursor because it's now a true competitor.

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#392

Post by ben_w »

dominotw wrote: post #349
ben_w wrote: post #315

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> When do you have time for all of this? I don’t mean the vibing part but the using the app part. Mix of this being spread over more than a year, that I'm not doomscrolling because HackerNews and Telegram are my main social media presences, and being unemployed/prematurely retired (which one depends on what one thinks of €1k/month passive income and no rent).

Thats amazing. Family and kids path is getting less and less attractive everday. hobbies > family.

FWIW, I regret not having had kids yet.

I am also weirdly unmotivated by opportunities to spend money, which is both how I got this passive income and lack of rent, and why it's borderline enough for me. FIRE is very easy when all your working life, you only spend rent+50%, the rest of your paycheque going to savings and investments; but most people can't do this.

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#393

Post by blks »

foxglacier wrote: post #348
ben_w wrote: post #262

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On the one hand, yes; on the other hand, so much of the training data comes from scraping the web that it feels wrong for them to do what they deny others the right to do. On the third hand, the settlement Anthropic famously had to pay was for copyright infringement because they didn't actually have the right to even access some of the training data they used, so I can see how this might be compatible with the law. O…

Companies that didn't give away all their content for free to anyone have actually denied AI companies from training on all their data without paying a fee. Reddit, Associated Press, etc. For those who chose to give it all away, the ship has sailed, but they did choose to give it away for free to anyone so they can't complain that they succeeded.

How exactly other websites “gave it all away”? Also examples you list are websites putting some explicit rule eg in their robots.txt or filtering web crawlers. This is all a reaction to existing situation, so Reddit for sure has been scrapped before Reddit realised what was happening.

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#394

Post by syspec »

jackjeff wrote: post #194

Is there some kind of alternative to Cursor in these terms - fast because the code is already indexed no need to start every prompt rediscovering the world with rg - in editor/vscode review much better than relying on git diff at the very end. You can click on next button to jump there. Quick edit in place. Or a quick prompt (seconds) to fix something small - in editor completion / quick edits, when you do things by…

Claude / Codex ex tensions inside of VSCode give you what you described. I ageee, I find people that use only the CLI barely read and review the code the agent creates until it's too late

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#395

Post by blks »

andy_ppp wrote: post #187
rgbrenner wrote: post #32

Anthropic already banned xAI for very similar ToS violations earlier this year: https://x.com/kyliebytes/status/2009686466746822731?s=46 So this is OpenAI following suit after Musk admitted to distilling their models. This was bound to happen once Cursor decided to sell itself to a competing model provider. It'll be interesting to see if Anthropic applies their ban to Cursor, or if that datacenter deal they signed wi…

Why you would trust Elon Musk to not hack you and steal your model weights is beyond me, but maybe they intend to use that compute just for training, still I’m sure there’s plenty of research there to take too…

Especially when he hires too little people, makes them work 80hrs a week and expect big and fast results

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#396

Post by mgcross »

Jcampuzano2 wrote: post #367
hackernud3s wrote: post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does Grok have a subscription that competes with Claude Max $100 plan (genuinely curious)

Yes, any Cursor sub includes a separate tier of usage for Cursor/SpaceX first party models separate from usage of third party models. I have a $20 Cursor sub still personally and would say that the usage for Grok models is much higher than what $20 gets you with Anthropic. I can't speak for the $100 plan but I would assume it scales similarly. I rarely run out of my usage monthly even with the $20 plan.

I'm on the $20 plan too and the only time I run over is if I'm using Opus (or probably other third-party models). Grok and Composer seem nearly free at this point. Cursor also gave me a $100 credit for Grok after 81% of my usage was on TP models. I don't think Grok 4.6 is quite at the level of Opus 5, but it's close and so much faster (and less chatty).

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#397

Post by zobzu »

phtrivier wrote: post #302
germandiago wrote: post #200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am pretty sure that the goal of these companies at the end is ruling more than what governments can. Just look at the pattern... they collude, they provide to them whatever is needed, and at some point, if this is not true yet, they will be the ones who will tell them what to do or not, bc you know how humans are, right... blackmailing, mess up the business or shames of people, etc. It is just a matter of time. The…

"Monopoly on the lawfully usage of force" + "regular and peaceful change of government" can go a very long way against "corporations governing the world". I'm curious if we'll ever get a form of civil war where corporate militias (corporate _robot_ militias in the case of xAI, of course) draw fire on good old meat policemen coming to bring the CEO to court. Sure, it may happen, but I suspect the alternatives (bribing…

sir this is robocop

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#398

Post by meerita »

jackjeff wrote: post #239
meerita wrote: post #232

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's OpenCode, Claude Code, Codex. I don't like to use GUIs so I rely purely on agentic AI on CLIs.

In the case of TUIs I’m going to assume you review the code externally in neovim or lazy git or something like that? I don’t like relying on GIT for that and making things as good/done as I go. But with these agentic tools that’s what I have to do. Stage everything I like, manually edits a few bits. But what do you when you find something where you want to say the agent: I don’t like this for reasons x and y redo as…

I review them on VIM, I use Zed as well.

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#400

Post by insanitybit »

cornholio wrote: post #167
rgbrenner wrote: post #32

Anthropic already banned xAI for very similar ToS violations earlier this year: https://x.com/kyliebytes/status/2009686466746822731?s=46 So this is OpenAI following suit after Musk admitted to distilling their models. This was bound to happen once Cursor decided to sell itself to a competing model provider. It'll be interesting to see if Anthropic applies their ban to Cursor, or if that datacenter deal they signed wi…

It's ironic how AI companies are re-inventing their own form of privately enforced copyright, lobby the government to ban foreign competitors that don't respect it etc., all while spending the last 5 years fighting tooth and nail against the copyright of the training material they're using. If you can take any book and turn it into a model, because it's "transformative enough", and "AI learns just like a person does"…

Contracts are not a "reinvented" form of copyright. This isn't even uncommon.
Post reply on HN