Live data from Hacker News

Twitter Viewer – View Twitter Without Account

twitterwebviewer.com

401–410 of 421 posts

Re: Twitter Viewer – View Twitter Without Account

#402

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Whatever twitter.now is which is neither.

It's Twitter. It legally owns the trademark "Twitter", the bird logo and the color blue. Musk really screwed up that one huh? Under UDRP rules it'll be pretty hard for them to seize their rightful domain name twitter.com, but maybe they'll manage.

Their USPTO is still pending, so we'll see. But yes legally they have good grounds to continue DBA as Twitter.

Re: Twitter Viewer – View Twitter Without Account

#403

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Whatever twitter.now is which is neither.

It's Twitter. It legally owns the trademark "Twitter", the bird logo and the color blue. Musk really screwed up that one huh? Under UDRP rules it'll be pretty hard for them to seize their rightful domain name twitter.com, but maybe they'll manage.

I guess I couldn't believe it. The LLM copy on that homepage is unbearable and amateurish.

Re: Twitter Viewer – View Twitter Without Account

#404

Earlier quoted context omitted.

SMS made you pay by character. RCS is the current free alternative.

so instead using Meta product you suggest using Google product, great alternative for Europe independence it's like when they wanna get rid of Visa/MC by switching to EU apps, which will require Google/Apple verification, what an improvement...

RCS is an international standard. Google only adds their client (and running the service if your mobile provider doesn't).

Don't know what EU apps are you talking about, but yes, mobile apps need Google services. Web interfaces don't.

Re: Twitter Viewer – View Twitter Without Account

#405
post #284

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem is that an EU-mandated digital communicating tool would look like the Minitel. Anyone remembering the French minitel?

I think it was quite good for the 1980s, it just got stuck there.

People seemed to like it being stuck in the 1980s.

Re: Twitter Viewer – View Twitter Without Account

#406

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's why we really need some kind of non profit or maybe two "social media" sites made with the public good in mind. One could be officially government sanctioned and funded (sort of like Voice of America but internal to the US more so) and have a strict organisation verification policy for local police / government and other quasi public entities (say like transportation systems and energy companies - etc)

So HTTP and IP

We're just reinventing moderated Usenet newsgroups.

Re: Twitter Viewer – View Twitter Without Account

#408
post #391

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> On Twitter there is a highly active community of space enthusiasts. Absolutely none of them would post slop like "Elon is not an engineer" You live in an algo bubble! TONS of intelligent people with backgrounds in space, defense and technology say it all the time on Twitter.

And all of them are wrong.

He isn't. He has a bachelor in economics and physics.

Re: Twitter Viewer – View Twitter Without Account

#409

Honest question: Why don't we have a UN-operated global social media that is used by all officials worldwide, instead of them using privately owned social media?

The EU has their own Mastodon instance, but unless you want to have responses (even if the official instance doesn't show them), it's cheaper to run a static news aggregator.

It would be nice, but it seems most people don't care about this.

Re: Twitter Viewer – View Twitter Without Account

#410

X. It's not twitter anymore

This burndown of the Brand Twitter by renaming it to X will make it to digital marketing textbooks for Universities across the world, I promise: The word Twitter itself became a mega/global brand throughout the years, and Musk detroyed it completely. The verb "to tweet" made it also into dictionaries around the world. You could speak the name in more or less every language, and the bird was widely known just by its i…

Sure. Totally agree, but it's confusing. For example, Wordpress still has Twitter-block. And when I try to explain new authors that they should use Twitter-block for X.com integration, they think that I'm stupid. But not me, right?
Post reply on HN