Live data from Hacker News

Feature Request: Support AGENTS.md

github.com

121–130 of 236 posts

Re: Feature Request: Support AGENTS.md

#121

Maybe I miss a bit of information here, but I'm wondering why a random PR in a repository ( https://github.com/Piebald-AI/tweakcc/pull/459 ) can close an issue in an unrelated repository ( https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/6235 )? Is that a misconfiguration, or is that on purpose for Github? I never noticed that before.

GitHub API says it was closed by bcherny himself: $ gh api repos/anthropics/claude-code/issues/6235 --jq '{state, state_reason, closed_at, closed_by}' { "closed_at": "2026-08-17T03:37:37Z", "closed_by": { ... "id": 1761758, "login": "bcherny", "url": " https://api.github.com/users/bcherny ", }, "state": "closed", "state_reason": "completed" }

Weird, at the top of the issue it says "fixed by " in a pill.

Re: Feature Request: Support AGENTS.md

#122
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They are trying to stop scraping, I guess.

Scrapers won't be stopped by needing an account; in the recent discussion [0] about this, someone mentioned that there's even a JSON API you can use - by appending .json to any post! It's to drive engagement... for the advertisers. They gotta keep the valuation up after the IPO. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49015533

Well ya, but they have written posts to mods explaining that their long term goal is to limit scraping.

Re: Feature Request: Support AGENTS.md

#123
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reddit is undergoing an even worse tragetory right now: They're a lot heavier on the censorship and sidewide ban. Subs are being astroturfed as much or worse than usual. On top of that they're trying to stop anonymous browsing by paywalling on a timer.

They finally killed the `old.reddit.com` subdomain for logged-out users this week, which was the final push I needed to stop even idly browsing. I've been using the site since at least the digg exodus in 2010.

you can still access old reddit by choosing on Settings → User Preferences → Prefer classic UI or something like that

Re: Feature Request: Support AGENTS.md

#125
post #105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Theres a study from earlier this year which suggests the opposite: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11988 Most of the agents.md and what people use it for / write into is does, in fact, not make a difference. Now, sure, this study is a bit old for LLM standards - as everything beyond the current month is - but a) I haven't seen any tangible evidence to the contrary and b) Since the basic inner workings of LLMs haven't chan…

That's not what the study says. from the abstract: > We conclude that while context files are useful for specifying non-standard coding practices, any attempts to improve performance should be rigorously evaluated before deployment. The purpose of AGENTS.md is not to improve "coding performance" as the study looked at, it's to give an agent practical instructions that are useful to your specific workflow. For example…

Yes, but since we are specifically talking about claude.md, Anthropic themselves claim on their website these files "serve[s] multiple purposes: providing architectural context, ..." (https://claude.com/blog/using-claude-md-files)

They also recommend starting with an /init command, which is also something the study very specifically called out as "having a marginal negative effect"

And from personal experience, I can only confirm that many people seem to see this as the main purpose of agents/claude md files - a persistent architectural overview of your project.

Quick Edit: My point simply being that I think it's understandable if some people don't understand the big deal about these files because they've had a drastically different experience than other people - anthropic themselves recommend apparently totally ineffective practices on their website, and the starter tool present in many harnesses seems to even have a (marginal) negative effect.

Re: Feature Request: Support AGENTS.md

#126
post #123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They finally killed the `old.reddit.com` subdomain for logged-out users this week, which was the final push I needed to stop even idly browsing. I've been using the site since at least the digg exodus in 2010.

you can still access old reddit by choosing on Settings → User Preferences → Prefer classic UI or something like that

As the gp says, only if you're logged in.

Re: Feature Request: Support AGENTS.md

#127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hmm. I'm using Firefox on a full-sized computer (that is, not a phone or tablet). Do you get different results with Firefox on a full-sized computer, or is that your primary web browser? > Somehow Reddit thinks I care enough about their content to set up an account and log in just to read it. They are mistaken. Same here.

I wouldn’t be surprised if it has more to do with the fact that I’m currently in Vietnam. I certainly get a lot of websites that give me extra hassle about accessing from here, or some simply refuse to load at all. Just try booking a domestic USA flight on Frontier Airlines or Southwest Airlines while currently being in Southeast Asia… For what it’s worth, I’ve received this on my iPhone running safari. I almost neve…

Doesn't work in Europe either -> full login wall, Desktop Firefox.

Re: Feature Request: Support AGENTS.md

#129

This reminds me of Reddit killing off third-party clients and Twitter doing the same. The decline wasn't immediately obvious at first, but it happened and it capped the growth trajectory of both. Twitter never grew as fast as it did during the third-party client and applications era. Reddit isn't adding meaningful, human-written content as fast as it was in that era. There's a lot more activity now, but based purely…

Actually, Reddit is a lot more dead than that right now. I would argue >90% of the content now is fake.

Re: Feature Request: Support AGENTS.md

#130

This reminds me of Reddit killing off third-party clients and Twitter doing the same. The decline wasn't immediately obvious at first, but it happened and it capped the growth trajectory of both. Twitter never grew as fast as it did during the third-party client and applications era. Reddit isn't adding meaningful, human-written content as fast as it was in that era. There's a lot more activity now, but based purely…

The Twitter situation was a bit different: I built the very first Android Twitter client which grew to millions of users. We later got acquired by TweetUp and I'm partly responsible for their strategy to acquire other popular clients, too. We basically owned 60%+ of the third-party market within months with the potential of 'migrating' a large portion to a new tbd Twitter competitor. Needless to say Twitter wasn't happy, and the rest is history. Never build on somebody else's turf.
Post reply on HN