Live data from Hacker News

Cursor launches Origin, GitHub alternative

cursor.com

381–390 of 519 posts

Re: Cursor launches Origin, GitHub alternative

#381
post #170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I love to hate on Github/Microsoft as much as the next person, but considering the insane amount of code being pushed to it every day, I'd say they're doing quite well.

I disagree. They’ve been struggling with up time for a long time, this seems more related to their move to azure than anything else. It also shows there’s a fundamental problem with their architecture or their development pattern to have these sorts of issues so frequently.

Plus a rather clear lack of investment into improving it / retaining their talent / etc, yeah: https://damrnelson.github.io/github-historical-uptime/

Anecdotally: at work I saw quite a lot of github-uptime-related issues, and because they're the central host for everything they become *cough* load bearing for a huge amount of the company. Stability and performance has been dramatically worse than the self-hosted phabricator+gitolite before it.

Re: Cursor launches Origin, GitHub alternative

#382
post #142

I can't imagine reaching for this instead of GitLab, GitTea, or one of the many other more mature and open source alternatives. Going for the managers, directors, and CTOs that make decisions and face no consequences if they negatively impact the team, I guess.

Could you imagine a CTO adopting this thing? They would have to be a complete moron. Yeah, let's standardize on this thing peddled by a lying crook that has fewer features than any of the alternatives. The only people who are going to use this are SpaceX, Tesla and a few developers who also use Grok.

Re: Cursor launches Origin, GitHub alternative

#384
post #170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel like the "GitHub is a mess" conversation is a little forced at times - I spend a significant portion of my work day in GitHub and while there have been an uptick in outages lately, it still feels like a very solid platform. I guess I personally wouldn't categorize it as a "mess" and the conversations I read about it here make me think I'm using an entirely different product than everyone else.

I love to hate on Github/Microsoft as much as the next person, but considering the insane amount of code being pushed to it every day, I'd say they're doing quite well.

I’ve heard from people who left GitHub that Microsoft pulled all their best dev ops people to work on AI scaling. This is blatant disinvestment by Microsoft bc they think GitHub is untouchable. I hope better alternatives than musk come up

Re: Cursor launches Origin, GitHub alternative

#385

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Actions should be decoupled from the version control system.

I disagree. The integrated workflow of actions, issues, code review and source control is a huge productivity win. There’s a reason people chase a “single pane of glass”.

A website where one views and interacts with all of these things does not necessitate that all of these things run on the same system. Since this most recent GitHub outage, I'm looking into modularizing my git server, issues, and actions; there's no reason why one going down should bring down all the others.

Re: Cursor launches Origin, GitHub alternative

#386
post #236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Git is absolutely miserable without things that GitHub, GitLab, and others provide, and there's still a huge ceiling to grow into in terms of layering on UX on top of Git. In my opinion, Git is holding software development back. Git only cares about lines of text. This is not enough in today's world.

Lots of standards are terrible without the actual tools on top of them (try making an HTTP request with just a network socket). But that doesn’t mean we should have single centralized tool that does everything. I’d posit there’s no big loss if you broke these things up and each had their own copy the repo (if needed): - CI/CD - issues - code review/pull requests - release artifact distribution - discovery+social cred…

Completely agree. Once again, the answer is protocols, not platforms.

Re: Cursor launches Origin, GitHub alternative

#387

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://www.githubstatus.com/history

Ahhh okay. They've definitely had some growing pains. By "fall from grace", I assumed you meant some sort of ethical/trust failure.

Github has lost trust. This wasn’t an isolated incident.

Re: Cursor launches Origin, GitHub alternative

#388
post #238
post #114

GitHub is a mess so lets throw our code into a Musk owned enterprise, famously a different shade of mess? How about neither? Man I wish we stuck with Subversion at this point.

Or Perforce. Perforce, in my experience, just worked. It also has sane conceptual names for things, a good CLI, SDKs, visual tools, cool features like workspaces that Git completely lacks, etc.

My understanding is that Perforce is really strong in the game development industry, right? I think it handles blob/large file assets better or something like that.

Re: Cursor launches Origin, GitHub alternative

#390

Cursor, which is now owned by Elon, who tried very hard to get all manner of data about citizens with his intrusions? I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks this isn't a great idea. He'll use it to feed Grok. I'm not a big fan of Github right now either but I wouldn't consider this alternative due to its ownership chain.

I love how people like you actually think Elon actually wanted your data.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN