Live data from Hacker News

Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

artificialanalysis.ai

311–320 of 472 posts

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#311
post #113

I'm just wondering why they sold compute to Anthropic if they were planning on still competing in this race?

As a point of comparison: Samsung has sold smartphone chips and later OLED displays to Apple for over fifteen years.

Deals like this that look awkward from the outside but are mutually beneficial to both participants exist everywhere.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#312

I've been using grok 4.5 with grok build soon after it came out and dropped claude. primarily for personal code. It communicates better. While that might not sound like a big deal it is. It doesn't give me a wall of text, tells me what I need to know and I'll make the actual decisions. It is very quick as well which means the sessions are far more interactive, I'll be steering it more. I sometimes cross check with co…

Out of interest, do Musk's politics impact your decision on whether or not to use Grok? I'd be interested to know where folks lie on the (Agree / Disagree) and (Use / Don't use) axes.

Will never use any product Musk is involved in creating for the rest of my life.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#313

I've been using grok 4.5 with grok build soon after it came out and dropped claude. primarily for personal code. It communicates better. While that might not sound like a big deal it is. It doesn't give me a wall of text, tells me what I need to know and I'll make the actual decisions. It is very quick as well which means the sessions are far more interactive, I'll be steering it more. I sometimes cross check with co…

Out of interest, do Musk's politics impact your decision on whether or not to use Grok? I'd be interested to know where folks lie on the (Agree / Disagree) and (Use / Don't use) axes.

i read an independent study that found other ai were all left of center (how ever one measures that, sentiment analysis normalized to a given population??). they said grok was evenly left/right split

but what's to validate any given population as centrist anyway

they suggested the ai opinion drift was caused by internet demographics not directly reflecting actual population i.e. California publishes more etc

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#314

Well this makes me bullish on Gemini if its this easy to reach the frontier

Who said it's easy? xAI staff are putting in 80+ hour weeks and building datacenters faster than anyone.

their entire founding team left recently for one. they are the weakest in mission and dont particularly pay much either

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#315

The main issue I have with grok is that Musk, its owner, did 2x seig heil at the presidential inauguration, and proceeded to gaslight the world about it (this is a strong form of dogwhistling, kind of a dog bullhorn). Therefore all services which have anything to do with Musk are ineligible for use - they are directly funding the worst kind of person.

[flagged]

Why? The timing was precise, the motion was precise, his facial features were grimaced with intense determination. I cannot fathom calling it anything else, and I see denying it as a kind of shibboleth for "we know but we are pretending it wasn't, wink wink nudge nudge".

Either it was deliberate, or the richest man on earth is so incompetent that he accidentally made a motion exactly mimicking a seig heil while welcoming a self-proclaimed king and dictator. Twice - once towards the audience, and once towards the flag of the united states. Neither option is good.

What was it?

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#317
post #136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

True story, for example take Tesla's promise of self driving which was delivered back in 2015.

[flagged]

What's wild to me is that today there are more companies with more than 100 unsupervised self driving cars out on the road that DID NOT exist (as a company) back when Tesla CEO told investors they're a year away from FSD.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#318

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Out of interest, do Musk's politics impact your decision on whether or not to use Grok? I'd be interested to know where folks lie on the (Agree / Disagree) and (Use / Don't use) axes.

Will never use any product Musk is involved in creating for the rest of my life.

Yeah, I'm in the same boat. No StarLink, no Grok, no X, no Tesla (that one is easy though—I typically spend about $15K when I buy a car).

He's become a toxic "brand".

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#319

I've been using grok 4.5 with grok build soon after it came out and dropped claude. primarily for personal code. It communicates better. While that might not sound like a big deal it is. It doesn't give me a wall of text, tells me what I need to know and I'll make the actual decisions. It is very quick as well which means the sessions are far more interactive, I'll be steering it more. I sometimes cross check with co…

Out of interest, do Musk's politics impact your decision on whether or not to use Grok? I'd be interested to know where folks lie on the (Agree / Disagree) and (Use / Don't use) axes.

I certainly have some political disagreements with Musk, but more than that I would say the way he runs his companies makes me extremely anxious. The man is just always talking about stuff that never actually happens. In practice it does seem like cooler heads prevail and Grok et al. have trajectories pretty in line with other major providers...but because they're pretty in line why take the risk? Why build on foundations that ostensibly could be re-tasked to produce a "woke free" Odyssey?

[1] https://futurism.com/future-society/elon-musk-ai-woke-free-o...

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#320
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not virtue signaling. People are allowed to have morals. And they are allowed to act in ways that align with those moral beliefs. > do you use Apple equipment despite Apple’s use of Chinese slave labor? If someone said they didn't buy Apple because of this, I'd support them in that too. People. Are. Complicated. We're allowed to have beliefs, we're allowed to have beliefs that aren't internally consistent. You g…

The issue is that this is supposed to be a tech discussion forum and many of us don’t want to be repeatedly beaten over the head with other people’s politics. Plenty of other places to be political, we just wish this wasn’t one of them.

Tech has always been political. You think Mitnick and Woz weren't political? You think windows and the powerpc werent political? That social media isn't political?

You don't like seeing politics you disagree with. You just don't think things you agree with are politics.

I come to HN to learn, to be exposed to different modes of thought. To engage in useful creative discourse over disagreements. The idea that HN or tech is free from politics is intellectually vacant thinking.

Post reply on HN