Live data from Hacker News

Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

artificialanalysis.ai

111–120 of 472 posts

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#111
cool

here's Stanford HAI's graph on the carbon emitted from model training per model:

https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/chart-showing-estima...

note that Grok's training, thanks to its portable gas generators that are magnitudes less efficient than even other integrated, permanent gas turbines, means the training for this model is dramatically less efficient than models like DeepSeek

a lot of the CO2 emission debate on AI is overblown but it's accurate for Grok

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#114
post #106

SpaceXAI is the only frontier model company that had its own compute/date centres and soon chip making factory, I think they will pull ahead with cheaper tokens similar intelligence and better harness/tools. Grok build is 2-5x faster than Claude Code in my opinion.

But can you trust any number or metric coming out of SpaceX given everything? Also you mean their own compute like the illegal data centre turbines ? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/15/elon-musk...

Because it works and they don’t charge a lot for it

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#115
post #37

I have never met a single human being who uses Grok for coding

I had a security incident the other day and Grok was the only model that would help. Claude and GPT refused on ethical grounds and only gave general advice. In an emergency, I'd only trust Grok. However, that's the only time I used Grok for coding (since Opus 4.8 it would take a lot to get me to switch away from Anthropic)

The "safety" guardrails in Anthropic and OpenAI models are becoming a noticeable problem for security work. And, the reason I'm keeping my Kimi subscription even though it's not a great deal; Kimi subscriptions are quite stingy for the price, but K3 will do vulnerability analysis and make a PoC without requiring you to be on the approved list of Fortune 500 or government entities that have access to Mythos or Daybreak.

I'm not touching Grok. But there are alternatives to Anthropic and OpenAI that don't refuse to do security work.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#118
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

MechaHitler was something that existed only on X's grok chatbot, due to a one-line system prompt change they reverted after half a day. That's different than using Grok as a model for coding.

[flagged]

only twice

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk_salute_controversy

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#120
post #34

Cursor, since Grok 4.5, has had an incredible deal for frontier level models, their subscription now goes way further than OpenAI or Anthropic. Even on their lower tier plans you can use a lot tokens on their of their first party models (Grok and Composer) and not really run out comparatively. Combine them with an orchestrator and implementor type setup and it goes even further.

How does Grok 4.5 compare to Opus >= 4.8 though? I'm willing to pay 2x for a 10% smarter model. Intelligence matters that much (because 10% smarter probably saves, on average, several hours of human time).

[deleted]
Post reply on HN