Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

artificialanalysis.ai

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

131–140 of 472 posts

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#131

Post by jeffyaw »

hmokiguess wrote: post #29
satvikpendem wrote: post #2

Cursor, since Grok 4.5, has had an incredible deal for frontier level models, their subscription now goes way further than OpenAI or Anthropic. Even on their lower tier plans you can use a lot tokens on their of their first party models (Grok and Composer) and not really run out comparatively. Combine them with an orchestrator and implementor type setup and it goes even further.

I believe they are the only western provider that has Kimi K3 on a subscription plan today as well. I would love to ditch Anthropic and be on Kimi if there were a subsidized plan like that with ZDR

you can use Kimi K3 on the typed++ model tier: https://typed.cloud

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#135

Post by shishcat »

hmokiguess wrote: post #29
satvikpendem wrote: post #2

Cursor, since Grok 4.5, has had an incredible deal for frontier level models, their subscription now goes way further than OpenAI or Anthropic. Even on their lower tier plans you can use a lot tokens on their of their first party models (Grok and Composer) and not really run out comparatively. Combine them with an orchestrator and implementor type setup and it goes even further.

I believe they are the only western provider that has Kimi K3 on a subscription plan today as well. I would love to ditch Anthropic and be on Kimi if there were a subsidized plan like that with ZDR

I’d love a subsidized Kimi subscription too. The official Kimi subscription is always out of stock and doesn’t have great limits, while the K3 allotments on OpenCode and Cursor don’t seem to last very long either.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#136

Post by amarka »

feifan wrote: post #126
isodev wrote: post #106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But can you trust any number or metric coming out of SpaceX given everything? Also you mean their own compute like the illegal data centre turbines ? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/15/elon-musk...

being a public company forces a lot of trust and transparency bc otherwise shareholders will sue you into oblivion

True story, for example take Tesla's promise of self driving which was delivered back in 2015.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#137

Post by scottyah »

enragedcacti wrote: post #84
mrandish wrote: post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Billionaire Elon Musk likely broke Wisconsin law when he promised to hand out $1 million checks to voters in the 2025 state Supreme Court election, a bipartisan panel has found. > The Wisconsin Elections Commission last week referred two complaints to the Brown County district attorney’s office, which can choose to bring criminal charges over violating the state law against election bribery. Pr…

[flagged]

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#138

Post by nozzlegear »

dogmayor wrote: post #57
kvirani wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Folks working in US govt tend to, based on convos I've had with one such person.

Not the best endorsement given the current US gov

Yeah, sounds a bit like a selection bias, i.e. the people who managed to survive the firings by DOGE and the current admin are the kind of people who might prefer Grok.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#140

Post by timr »

pkaye wrote: post #124
timr wrote: post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What’s the multiplier? GH copilot nerfed their product so badly that I unsubscribed.

They don't do request based pricing anymore. Its just token based (1 credit = $0.01) plus some bonus credit based on which plan you subscribe. So for example a $39 plan get $70 of credits. https://github.com/features/copilot/plans https://github.blog/changelog/2026-08-06-kimi-k3-is-now-avai...

Yeah, I know, but "credit" translates differently because the models bill at different rates, which gets turned into "multipliers" (or at least, it did).

Have they converted entirely to transparent API rates + base allocation now? One of the reasons I left was that if I was going to be billed at API rates anyway, I'd just rather use the APIs. The value proposition still sucks for individuals now, when the other major providers are bundling at below-API rates.

Post reply on HN