Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not evil, just dumb.
you are being too charitable, they are both.
US strikes $1.2B deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects
451–460 of 933 posts
Re: US strikes $1.2B deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects
#452Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's spelled lead, and it has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to cause brain damage. There is no safe level of lead exposure, it causes neurological damage at any level of exposure and it stays in your body permanently. You're wrong on every count and simply spreading disinformation. Please don't do that.
I never claimed lead does not cause damage, it does. I dispute it is the primary fault in bad politics, and I offered an alternative theory.
Re: US strikes $1.2B deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects
#453Earlier quoted context omitted.
>RWE said that it will now reinvest the sum into conventional gas projects, including $900m (£669m) in a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal project in Louisiana.
That kinda stinks, I wonder if getting the settlement was contingent on the re-investment.
Re: US strikes $1.2B deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects
#454Earlier quoted context omitted.
They still mostly rely on coal. Slightly more than half of electricity is generated by burning coal, whereas in the US, it's only 15%. The renewable energy share in generation is roughly the same in the US and China, but not for capacity.
You can look at current levels, or look at trends. China has stopped increasing coal. They're building a small number of new coal plants, but this is outstripped by the coal plants being underutilized or decommissioned China is really only building new renewables, almost 100x as much net renewable capacity per year compared to nuclear.
Re: US strikes $1.2B deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects
#455Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh it shouldn't be a political issue at all. We don't need the government forcing us to reduce energy use, we need people to do it for themselves.
It is absolutely the government's job to regulate externalities. Otherwise, personal virtue is just subsidizing third party vice. Energy is fungible. Every joule you save lowers the cost for people who don't care.
It seems reasonable to want a government to help ensure externalities aren't being ignored in prices, but not to regulate them by saying how much and what types of things people can use. I don't want my government allocated a set amount of energy I use, for example, but I would be fine with them ensuring prices accurately reflect the true cost.
Ironically they often do the opposite, subsidizing energy and food costs which make things cheaper and hide externalities.
Re: US strikes $1.2B deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects
#456Re: US strikes $1.2B deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects
#457Earlier quoted context omitted.
Out country is ran by bunch of Lionel Hutz clones
[flagged]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_International_Golf_Club_...
Re: US strikes $1.2B deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects
#458Re: US strikes $1.2B deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects
#459The USA is governed by evil people, and the people of the nation are too stupid and expecting someone else to stop them. Plain as day light.
No, we're not expecting someone else to stop it. We voted for this. The evil is not imposed on us. It is us. Not everyone, but a majority. The minority is looking for ways to stop it, but it requires getting literally everyone else to work together. Which means any disagreement among them results in a loss, and more of the same evil.