Earlier quoted context omitted.
"common sense" is common sense because it is the "sound and prudent judgment based on a simple perception of the situation or facts" (1). Maybe what you meant to say is that the position isn't, in fact, "common sense", that it is neither sound or prudent? (1) https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/common%20sense
Keyword being "simple". The common sense solution often turns out to be unsound based on a more detailed perception of the situation
US strikes $1.2B deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects
241–250 of 933 posts
Re: US strikes $1.2B deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects
#242Earlier quoted context omitted.
That number directly correlates with life quality in almost every country on earth. More energy per capita means higher life quality, without a doubt in every high quality place.
There must be a cap where quality of life is good enough though, right? Or do you propose it should go up indefinitely? Air conditioning is quite nice if you find yourself living in a hot environment, for example. But do we really all need smart watches? Or cameras everywhere? Or LLMs, for that matter?
Re: US strikes $1.2B deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects
#243Re: US strikes $1.2B deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects
#244Earlier quoted context omitted.
"common sense" is common sense because it is not "specialised sense" or "expert sense" So if politicians base their decisions on "common sense", they confess to not being able to use experts that refine their knowledge and position about a topic. A "common sense" strategy is therefore what is most popular and on the basis of the understanding of laymen without deeper understanding or knowledge.
Common sense is the sense of commoners. The entirity of science if a fight against common sense. In Poland the closest phrase to "common sense" is "na chłopski rozum" which means "according to villager's mind/smarts".
Re: US strikes $1.2B deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects
#245[flagged]
Re: US strikes $1.2B deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects
#246Re: US strikes $1.2B deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects
#247Insane. Over the last year, wind - mostly offshore - has generated more than 35% of electricity here. Gas is down to 27%. It's really, really good. And it looks cool.
What's more mental you talk to any Germans about deprecating their Nuclear power stations they will bang on about their plan for renewables and then you read these sorts of headlines. What the hell is happening over there? Why can't they get 'energy' despite being a scientifically literate nation. France has a far superior energy policy so it's not like you even have to travel beyond a few miles to see a wildly diffe…
Re: US strikes $1.2B deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects
#248Earlier quoted context omitted.
"common sense" is common sense because it is not "specialised sense" or "expert sense" So if politicians base their decisions on "common sense", they confess to not being able to use experts that refine their knowledge and position about a topic. A "common sense" strategy is therefore what is most popular and on the basis of the understanding of laymen without deeper understanding or knowledge.
For at least a few years, "common sense" has been hijacked by populist politicians, now it just means whatever simplistic idea that fits their worldview, even when it's not complicated to see that said idea is clearly misguided. The original meaning seems lost to me.
Re: US strikes $1.2B deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects
#249You would think that the US would be all for energy that reduces its reliance on the far east, regardless of the climate change benefit