81–90 of 280 posts
Giving free ChatGPT users access to reasoning (the 'Think' toggle) will have a broader impact on the world than every new paid model and coding agent combined.
That would explain a lot of the terrible AI/LLM takes online.
I can't wait to never see a reasoning button ever again. Why do I have to reason about what reasoning level to use?
Sadly it's not available anymore on the updated desktop app (formerly Codex) and the previous desktop app (formerly ChatGPT) is abandoned.
I can't wait to never see a reasoning button ever again. Why do I have to reason about what reasoning level to use?
Some people want quick results. Some people want it to keep searching for a new math proof overnight without giving up, and they have money to burn. It seems like giving it a time limit or a budget in dollars would be clearer, though? Or, keep searching until I come back to the computer and ask about progress.
Giving free ChatGPT users access to reasoning (the 'Think' toggle) will have a broader impact on the world than every new paid model and coding agent combined.
Does the free tier really not have access to reasoning models? That would explain a lot of the terrible AI/LLM takes online.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ads.
Ads work when you can server $.01 worth of ads to a user for $.0001 of server cost. I fail to see how you can make it work when doing LLM inference which is significantly costlier than web search.
I can't wait to never see a reasoning button ever again. Why do I have to reason about what reasoning level to use?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If we could show the current models to someone like Alan Turing, I am sure he would conclude that we have AGI.
And after half an hour using it he'd just admit that his test was way too simple as these models are still way too dumb
It is a huge leap. Now we can start talking about "intelligence" at all - we really couldn't before. That we're still hovering barely above the starting line is a separate matter (also worth noting, of course).
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ads.
Ads work when you can server $.01 worth of ads to a user for $.0001 of server cost. I fail to see how you can make it work when doing LLM inference which is significantly costlier than web search.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ads.
Ads work when you can server $.01 worth of ads to a user for $.0001 of server cost. I fail to see how you can make it work when doing LLM inference which is significantly costlier than web search.
The median LLM query isn't significantly costlier than web search.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some people want quick results. Some people want it to keep searching for a new math proof overnight without giving up, and they have money to burn. It seems like giving it a time limit or a budget in dollars would be clearer, though? Or, keep searching until I come back to the computer and ask about progress.
I don't understand this at all. Whenever I ask Gemini 3.1 Pro Extended, or Claude 5 Max something in chat, the most I ever wait is maybe 30 seconds. Is that really so bad?