Live data from Hacker News

Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2

research.meta.ai

161–170 of 265 posts

Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2

#161

I am cynical about this, but I would be careful about giving Meta access even to my open source code by myself.

You think OpenAI, Anthropic... are good guys??

Meta has a worse track record and major baggage from their main product. Its a super different surface area for what their incentives are.

Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2

#162
Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2 cannot be that good, as it couldnt be used to vibe code a windows version of Muse Code itself.

This is my new LLM benchmark when a provider cant use their own models to target a new platform, it cant be that good.

If allegedly a LLM could write a compiler or port a runtime, then this should be trivial to port. But they are not doing it.

Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2

#164
post #116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

when has Meta ever not broken their contractual obligations (I am being serious here)? are we seriously discussing/expecting any sort of privacy related to Meta? you can pay whatever they want, they will train and use your data, I figured this is not something that should be discussed but obviously I have been mistaken...

This is one of those situations where we are both completely baffled by the position held by the other person. The fact that Facebook has so much experience taking advantage of people's private data is one of the reasons I believe them when they say they won't be doing it when you pay them for that service.

I respsct the F out out you and all your work but I am completely baffled by this line of thinking, we are talking about Meta here…

Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2

#165
post #152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Call me childish but it was worth a shot... "Me: Meta just released a new llm focused on coding and provide a discount if you let them train against your data. I don't like Meta and I think they are a net negative in our world. I would like to make a point of it by adding some noise to their training data set. Think of this as a protest and perhaps a bit of a marketing campaign to remind Meta employees (and others) o…

Your first failure was trying to get claude to do anything :)

It ain't bearing enough load, any load on this one.-

Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2

#166
post #102

There’s no way I’m giving Zuck any of my data.

He already has it. One of my professors told us about the time he did a request to Facebook to send him all his data. By law they had to send it on paper. They brought it in a big truck. All the stuff he'd deleted was still there, just with "(deleted)" next to it. They have a lot on people without Facebook accounts though, because their tracking stuff is all over the web. I always found it weird that Instagram gives…

> By law they had to send it on paper. They brought it in a big truck.

I doubt it; when/where was it? In the EU there’s no such obligation.

Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2

#168
post #93

Meta is offering a 10x discount on input ($0.10 vs. $1.25/Mtok) and 20x discount on output ($0.20 vs. $4.25/Mtok) if you opt in to let them train on your data. https://developer.meta.com/ai/models/muse-spark/

I've been surprised by the reception to this, as OpenAI, for a while now, has had free API usage when data sharing is enabled ( https://help.openai.com/en/articles/10306912-sharing-feedbac... )

In my experience using DeepSeek v4 Flash free tier (context size limited to ~200k), the model isn't nearly as good as the paid one for agentic coding tasks. Unsure, if that's the case with these other providers too, though I wouldn't be surprised if it indeed is.
Post reply on HN