Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

qwencloud.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

41–50 of 59 posts

Re: Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

#41

Post by cubefox »

NBJack wrote: post #4

If I had a nickel for every model card, repo, or spec posted here that had zero samples of the actual output, I could probably start financing a rack of MI455Xs.

If you register you can try it for free.

Re: Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

#42

Post by CamperBob2 »

minimaxir wrote: post #39
Eueudhsbsj32 wrote: post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I doubt any labs will be releasing weights for frontier image models. Why would they want to deal with the amount of bad press they'll get for unsavory porn? Look at what happened to Grok.

Minimax just released the weights for a video model ( https://huggingface.co/MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-H3 ) that apparently only has limited safeguards.

If it has any safeguards at all, I don't think they've been found yet... and /r/unstablediffusion has been trying.

Re: Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

#43

Post by CamperBob2 »

vunderba wrote: post #34
svachalek wrote: post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

gpt-2-image has such a yellow tinge though. It stands out badly on nearly any screen. The image quality is great otherwise, but I generally prefer nano banana for its color balance.

True but it’s at least addressable with some basic tone-mapping changes. It’s easier to correct an issue like this than to deal with an image that simply doesn’t follow your prompt. Here's a quick trend of the "piss filter" in the gpt image series: https://imgpb.com/vCZidh

Not a great test case, considering how much of the artwork in-distribution for that type of image will have age-yellowed lacquer.

Re: Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

#45

Post by JacobAsmuth »

amelius wrote: post #27
NBJack wrote: post #4

If I had a nickel for every model card, repo, or spec posted here that had zero samples of the actual output, I could probably start financing a rack of MI455Xs.

I prefer no samples over cherry picked samples, though.

Really? You prefer not to see the top end of the distribution? Why?

Re: Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

#46

Post by tingletech »

When I tried to sign up for Qwen last month (after getting an ad on youtube), after entering my credit card for a "free" trial, Alibaba wanted me to upload a picture of my driver's license to be able to use it! I almost sold by BABA.

Re: Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

#47

Post by tingletech »

cubefox wrote: post #11
john_strinlai wrote: post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The page does not mention open source. on the right-hand side, it says: "Version Tag: MAJOR Open Source: No Updated: Jul 20, 2026"

It doesn't for me.

you have to have either a tall viewport or scroll to the bottom of the page

Re: Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

#50

Post by Eueudhsbsj32 »

minimaxir wrote: post #39
Eueudhsbsj32 wrote: post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I doubt any labs will be releasing weights for frontier image models. Why would they want to deal with the amount of bad press they'll get for unsavory porn? Look at what happened to Grok.

Minimax just released the weights for a video model ( https://huggingface.co/MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-H3 ) that apparently only has limited safeguards.

I forgot about that.. I'm surprised China allowed them to release that. Surely it will only increase the likelihood and severity of western restrictions on Chinese open models.

Unless they see it as a way to stoke anti-AI sentiment in the west and further polarize us..

Post reply on HN