Live data from Hacker News

Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

qwencloud.com

31–40 of 59 posts

Re: Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

#31

Will be interesting to see if they release the weights for local deployments. I love running Flux2 locally via ComfyUI.

I doubt any labs will be releasing weights for frontier image models.

Why would they want to deal with the amount of bad press they'll get for unsavory porn? Look at what happened to Grok.

Re: Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

#32
post #15

Looks like this model is meaningfully less good than gpt-image-2. Arena.ai score is 1263 vs 1380. https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text-to-image

Everything is less good than gpt-2-image and I suspect that will be the case for awhile, until potentially Nano Banana Pro 2. However, cost is significantly lower in this case. A Pro image here is $0.04, a gpt-2-image high is $0.21 and lower resolution.

Gpt 2 image is unlimited on a chatgpt pro plan

Re: Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

#33
post #15

Looks like this model is meaningfully less good than gpt-image-2. Arena.ai score is 1263 vs 1380. https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text-to-image

Everything is less good than gpt-2-image and I suspect that will be the case for awhile, until potentially Nano Banana Pro 2. However, cost is significantly lower in this case. A Pro image here is $0.04, a gpt-2-image high is $0.21 and lower resolution.

gpt-2-image has such a yellow tinge though. It stands out badly on nearly any screen. The image quality is great otherwise, but I generally prefer nano banana for its color balance.

Re: Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Everything is less good than gpt-2-image and I suspect that will be the case for awhile, until potentially Nano Banana Pro 2. However, cost is significantly lower in this case. A Pro image here is $0.04, a gpt-2-image high is $0.21 and lower resolution.

gpt-2-image has such a yellow tinge though. It stands out badly on nearly any screen. The image quality is great otherwise, but I generally prefer nano banana for its color balance.

True but it’s at least addressable with some basic tone-mapping changes. It’s easier to correct an issue like this than to deal with an image that simply doesn’t follow your prompt.

Here's a quick trend of the "piss filter" in the gpt image series:

https://imgpb.com/vCZidh

Re: Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

#37

Pretty annoying user experience trying to test out the model on the official Qwen site. You get an immediate popup with "Security Notice: For security purposes, please add a payment method" that blocks you from clicking anywhere. Honestly if you're launching a new model, you should probably just make it free for the 24 hours after launch so people can test it out. Otherwise just wait till it's on openrouter.

Not a great time to announce a pile of closed-weight excuses and locked gates when MiniMax-H3 just dropped.

Qwen lost some key people after 3.6 and it looks like we're seeing the consequences of that, or perhaps the cause.

Re: Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Everything is less good than gpt-2-image and I suspect that will be the case for awhile, until potentially Nano Banana Pro 2. However, cost is significantly lower in this case. A Pro image here is $0.04, a gpt-2-image high is $0.21 and lower resolution.

gpt-2-image has such a yellow tinge though. It stands out badly on nearly any screen. The image quality is great otherwise, but I generally prefer nano banana for its color balance.

[deleted]

Re: Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

#39

Will be interesting to see if they release the weights for local deployments. I love running Flux2 locally via ComfyUI.

I doubt any labs will be releasing weights for frontier image models. Why would they want to deal with the amount of bad press they'll get for unsavory porn? Look at what happened to Grok.

Minimax just released the weights for a video model (https://huggingface.co/MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-H3) that apparently only has limited safeguards.

Re: Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

#40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As I’ve said before, I wouldn’t put a lot of stock in Arena’s scoring system. They have MAI Image 2.5 ranked above Gemini Nano Banana Pro, and maybe that’s true on paper but good luck using it. Microsoft’s censorship makes Google feel like the wild west by comparison. They also have Meta’s Muse Image ranked above NB Pro, which is just patently absurd. In my own GenAI benchmark it only managed a lackluster 7 passes ou…

The photo rankings on this page are so absurd that the only reasonable explanation is that they were judged by an AI.

The rankings are for prompt adherence, not subjective quality.
Post reply on HN