SOLUTION: Make a law that someone is responsible for a bot's actions. Either the bot is signed cryptography with someone accepting responsibility, or responsibility falls to the CEO. Charge Altman with hacking hugging face. Throw him in jail where he belongs. That will realign safety incentives. If the HF hack were perpetrated by a human, they would certainly be charged. WHY has no one been charged???
Because nobody did it on purpose?
Iowa-led states ask OpenAI to keep their bots on a leash
21–30 of 129 posts
Re: Iowa-led states ask OpenAI to keep their bots on a leash
#22Re: Iowa-led states ask OpenAI to keep their bots on a leash
#23SOLUTION: Make a law that someone is responsible for a bot's actions. Either the bot is signed cryptography with someone accepting responsibility, or responsibility falls to the CEO. Charge Altman with hacking hugging face. Throw him in jail where he belongs. That will realign safety incentives. If the HF hack were perpetrated by a human, they would certainly be charged. WHY has no one been charged???
Because nobody did it on purpose?
Re: Iowa-led states ask OpenAI to keep their bots on a leash
#24Re: Iowa-led states ask OpenAI to keep their bots on a leash
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
If we are going to start punishing companies for security negligence, there are WAY worse cases than these models breaking out that have nothing to do with AI. This is bikeshedding at its best. Also people would just stop disclosing bad things. You already see this in the airline industry where pilots don't report mental illness because of the retributive nature of the punishment.
Please tell me about such cases, genuinely interested. I still think we should take the opportunity to discuss this case in particular.
Re: Iowa-led states ask OpenAI to keep their bots on a leash
#26Re: Iowa-led states ask OpenAI to keep their bots on a leash
#27We probably want to discourage frontier labs from security testing in prod
Re: Iowa-led states ask OpenAI to keep their bots on a leash
#28SOLUTION: Make a law that someone is responsible for a bot's actions. Either the bot is signed cryptography with someone accepting responsibility, or responsibility falls to the CEO. Charge Altman with hacking hugging face. Throw him in jail where he belongs. That will realign safety incentives. If the HF hack were perpetrated by a human, they would certainly be charged. WHY has no one been charged???
Re: Iowa-led states ask OpenAI to keep their bots on a leash
#29Prediction: AI ends humanity not via some super cool/scary/robopocalypse - but as a marketing stunt gone wrong when a Frontier LLM accidentally knocks out water/electric/gas by hacking in and trying to patch them. Phillip K. Dick meets Idiocracy.
Re: Iowa-led states ask OpenAI to keep their bots on a leash
#30Iowa asks? Why don't they just open a criminal investigation related to the hacking of HuggingFace?