241–250 of 312 posts
This feels like a trumpian tantrum from someone at openai. If they’re innocent, just win the lawsuit. Is this quibbling over details supposed to win the public over? Because afaik the public doesn’t know or care about this, and publicizing it just makes it worse.
My favorite thing about this is in 2026 it's still a major hurdle to move 200GB around.
Is it normal for a company this big to make a public blog post like this with almost no introduction to what they’re on about? I would expect them to start out with something like Apple is suing us for yada yada yada, but instead it reads like the diary of a hurt teenager.
This guy from Weil claims to be representing you. For some reason, he is lying about speaking with me on the phone. I don't know who he is and we have never spoken.
I don't know what the point of his lie is, but could you please confirm if he is actually representing you, and if so, whether you have other counsel you can use. I don’t think interacting through him is appropriate given this behavior.
--- So, a lawyer emailed the wrong person. That's it. And they use that as a peg to hang their whole case on. I guess GPT 6 thought this was the real smoking gun!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can have multiple users on a single device. https://source.android.com/docs/devices/admin/multi-user Either with a single local account that accesses multiple Google accounts, or multiple local accounts. Though this is device specific, it may be disabled by your manufacturer/provider. As mentioned elsewhere though, an enrolled phone is an enrolled phone so corporate wiping will wipe the entire phone and not just…
Not true - you can do full MDM type enrolment or just the one where t can wipe the work part of the phone. On Android and iOS
I'm pretty sure this is a thread about how you can't do things like that on iOS.
Regardless, its been a long time since I've had to use a personal device for work purposes and at the time Android seemed to only want to lock the entire phone down. If that is now fixed them thats great.
Is it normal for a company this big to make a public blog post like this with almost no introduction to what they’re on about? I would expect them to start out with something like Apple is suing us for yada yada yada, but instead it reads like the diary of a hurt teenager.
From: Che Chang Date: Feb 23, 2026, at 8:04 PM Subject: Re: Former Apple Employees at OpenAI Retaining Non-public, Confidential, and Proprietary Information To: Hi [Apple in-house legal counsel] and [Apple in-house legal counsel], This guy from Weil claims to be representing you. For some reason, he is lying about speaking with me on the phone. I don't know who he is and we have never spoken. I don't know what the po…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not just weird, that's completely ridiculous for the most valuable public US company. And it gets more ridiculous when you realise Apple makes the software, the hardware, the OS, and the cloud services. I... really question the rationale here.
Nit-but Apple has fallen to Nvidia and Alphabet, which is a sign of the times.
Setting aside the presented evidence, it feels weird for somewhat emotionally charged complaining like this to go on an official company blog. Companies are generally pretty tight-lipped about active litigation outside court documents, right? This just seems a bit amateurish, down to the title. Is public opinion about this case so important to them?
I used to think there was an air of professionalism with really successful, powerful people and entities - until I read the kind of drivel that Epstein and friends were emailing each other. Now seeing the worlds most powerful organisations act like children doesn't surprise me at all.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was a bit confused too initially, but it looks like Chang was asking for the data to be copied _off his iCloud_ by the existing employee on his final day of employment. And then everything after that is just the existing employee asking for help on things Chang had prior knowledge of
What's with the USB stick? Any files he had should just be checked into a GIT repo or copied to an Apple server. So 90's…
Data theft (i.e. taking corporate IP) was normalised until very recently (I'd say the last 2-3 years with the rise of the adoption of DLP and public litigation). A few examples I can think of thing I've heard _just_ in my own career; terabytes of client data taken by a former consultant, sales reps that joined _solely for the purpose_ of taking this quarter's leads and then ghosting the company, execs forcing the use…