Live data from Hacker News

U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war

cnbc.com

21–30 of 769 posts

Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It wouldn’t be the first war the USA loose against a smaller enemy. See Vietnam, Afghanistan, etc etc.

This was very quick though.

Iran has been preparing for this war for almost 50 years, and they have more leverage than Vietnamese or Talebans had.

Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war

#23
This is already the lifeline Europe is using to save its auto industry from the electric... the US is next. Just need to open up competitive bidding for the production of these components. Licensing patriot production to Ukraine will be a good start... S. Korea next

Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war

#24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It wouldn’t be the first war the USA loose against a smaller enemy. See Vietnam, Afghanistan, etc etc.

This was very quick though.

It turns out public money is more expensive these days. Debt is a more mainstreamly exposed problem.

Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war

#25
post #11
post #5

That's hard to believe. US with it's military spending should be able to join two large scale conflicts at the same time, not to have problem with a one minor conflict.

Paper tiger.

That is a remarkably stupid thing to say about the US military.

Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war

#26
post #5

That's hard to believe. US with it's military spending should be able to join two large scale conflicts at the same time, not to have problem with a one minor conflict.

America could theretically sustain other cheaper losses, like a few more F15s going down - but Trump is rightfully terrified of the political fallout of American pilots being capturred and torture videos showing up on Telegram.

Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war

#27
post #11
post #5

That's hard to believe. US with it's military spending should be able to join two large scale conflicts at the same time, not to have problem with a one minor conflict.

Paper tiger.

Don’t worry, they can still carpet bomb with high explosive and nuclear always remains an option lest you forget.

Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war

#28

I like how China and Russia are mentioned as adversaries that the US might be less likely to deter with their dwindling supply of long-range munition, but the country that so helpfully "received" (being bombed) all that supply and is the reason for the stockpile being minimal right now, isn't mentioned as an adversary that could take advantage of this.

Ukraine will take advantage of low PrSM stock ... how?

Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war

#29
post #5

That's hard to believe. US with it's military spending should be able to join two large scale conflicts at the same time, not to have problem with a one minor conflict.

It's easy to believe, it's hard to realize.

The conflict with Iran is only 'minor' in certain respects, it's a major air campaign otherwise, involving strategic bombing on par with the Iraq War 2 - or at least the initial period.

The US is bombing them from very far away places, the amount of logistical overhead is unthinkable.

These munitions cost a fortune in part because they are purchased in lower quantities, and yes, they have to be able to do a 10x-50x instant ramp up in order to be effective (aka capacity not inventory which is the strategic key).

It takes 2 years minimum to adjust an economy in that way and the US does not have good supply chains.

It's unlikely the US could hope to fight any kind of prolonged conflict with China 'in the area of Chinese territory' for very obvious reasons: they have the supply chains, 1 billion workers, and can turn them on a dime, and don't have 'far to go' to deploy weapons.

The US doesn't even have reliable ways of getting goods and materials into the theatre and has limited quantities of everything.

That said, there are still ways to defend Taiwan and/or to make an invasion futile - but 'broad conflict' ... nope.

Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war

#30
post #2

What is there even to say about this? Where does one even begin?

US adversary countries have to love everything that is happening. If you’re China you win by doing nothing, just let the US administration pillage the country
Post reply on HN