That's hard to believe. US with it's military spending should be able to join two large scale conflicts at the same time, not to have problem with a one minor conflict.
U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war
11–20 of 769 posts
Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war
#12That's the one glaring weakness of relying too heavily on missiles. They are expensive and difficult to manufacture. And they have a limited shelf life, making stockpiles also expensive In previous conflicts the US military could get a lot done with bombs, but that's risky if you can't get air superiority and take out all enemy anti-air systems. Which is more difficult against an enemy who can shoot at your air bases…
Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war
#13What is there even to say about this? Where does one even begin?
The title says "virtually all" but the first paragraph says "much". The actual stockpile is probably larger than this news report would make it seem. It would be convenient for Trump and his Russia-loving cronies if it would appear that the USA has no more weapons to support Ukraine with, of course.
Many advanced NATO weapons being difficult to produce and only being available in small quantities is something that has been discussed before, I don't think that's news. The rate at which they're being spammed without much result at Iran is, but that's hardly surprising given the current people in charge.
Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war
#14Did the US just have the same fate as Russia where they where feared for their military until they used it?
Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war
#15Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war
#16What is there even to say about this? Where does one even begin?
- A country, even as big as the US, is strictly, evidently, not exceptional.
- The US lost the majority of the wars it joined/started in the last 100 years and came home every time trying to sell it as a victory despite not achieving their war goals.
- You may have weapons or power of some kind, but every move you make costs you some kind of currency: time, material, energy, credibility, goodwill. You may have large amounts, but they're never infinite.
- Acts of raw destruction as mean towards a goal is often not ideal: change and control are "constructive" concepts, while bombs can only offer you guaranteed chaos. You MIGHT be able to steer that chaos afterwards, but it's not guaranteed and numbers do not simply improve your position here. (see: Iraq, etc.)
Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war
#17Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war
#18First, those are short- to medium-range weapons.
Second, the USAF and USN hold most of the US's long-range precision weaponry, the only real exception being the Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW), which is not yet fielded.
Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war
#19And then China gets frisky with Taiwan and the US will totally not abandon them and tell them to just give up pressured by the lack of firepower to defend them, the risks of China getting back into bidding oil in international markets and the mess the treasury would be in if China raises capital by selling bonds (they just told the fed to print more so Japan can buy yens without selling their US bonds, so they are at least very concerned about the possibility).
Sorry for the rant.
Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war
#20Did the US just have the same fate as Russia where they where feared for their military until they used it?
The Russo-Ukrainian war is a war of invasion.
The US-Iranian is more of an air superiority campaign.
If you want any take away lesson: don't attack countries that care about defending themselves. Not everyone is Iraq.
And don't underestimate the efficiency of asymmetric warfare.