Live data from Hacker News

U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war

cnbc.com

1–10 of 769 posts

Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war

#3
That's the one glaring weakness of relying too heavily on missiles. They are expensive and difficult to manufacture. And they have a limited shelf life, making stockpiles also expensive

In previous conflicts the US military could get a lot done with bombs, but that's risky if you can't get air superiority and take out all enemy anti-air systems. Which is more difficult against an enemy who can shoot at your air bases and aircraft carriers. But those previous conflicts might have contributed to a false sense of security about required missile stockpiles

Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war

#8
post #5

That's hard to believe. US with it's military spending should be able to join two large scale conflicts at the same time, not to have problem with a one minor conflict.

That would be true if the money spent was actually optimized on output rather than expensive contractors, consultants, and third party profits. :(

Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war

#9
I like how China and Russia are mentioned as adversaries that the US might be less likely to deter with their dwindling supply of long-range munition, but the country that so helpfully "received" (being bombed) all that supply and is the reason for the stockpile being minimal right now, isn't mentioned as an adversary that could take advantage of this.

Re: U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war

#10
post #5

That's hard to believe. US with it's military spending should be able to join two large scale conflicts at the same time, not to have problem with a one minor conflict.

It’s easier to believe when missiles are the only strategy being used in the war…
Post reply on HN