Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was there for the Great Recession, and they were indeed in the public discussion. I remember the year 2007, as a 20 year old anti-capitalist, I was counting days until the economic crash. As predicted by plenty of left-wing economists at the time. The only people who didn’t see it coming were the capitalists who were invested in the inflated market, and had bought into pseudo-scientific economic theories that serve…
I was too - and to be frank: it's dishonestly revisionist to say this was a topic in the public eye. There's a very good reason a book (and movie) like The Big Short was such a big hit. It's because it was about the handful of people who actually saw the crash coming and were confident enough to put their money and reputation on the line.
AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T
111–120 of 188 posts
Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
Internet didn't disappear after the dotcom crash, but a lot of money did. This is what could happen here I think.
unfortunately, the dotcom ate just money; the housing crash ate money and people. This will be some combination of the two; I wouldn't doubt a few pension funds in the deep red states get crushed if it takes money and property with it.
Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
You have any examples? Because all of the biggest and most famous crashes were events that only a very small minority of people ever saw coming. Tulips, 1929, Dotcom, Great Recession, 2010's Flash Crash - none of these were in the public discussion before they happened.
I was there for the Great Recession, and they were indeed in the public discussion. I remember the year 2007, as a 20 year old anti-capitalist, I was counting days until the economic crash. As predicted by plenty of left-wing economists at the time. The only people who didn’t see it coming were the capitalists who were invested in the inflated market, and had bought into pseudo-scientific economic theories that serve…
Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fiber and railroads don't depreciate after 3 years of use like AI chips. Fiber and railroads don't need tens of billions of dollars in continuing yearly maintenance expenses to keep them from going stale.
The "3 years" figure has been repeated endlessly and yet the same H100s are making today roughly what they did in Jan 2024...
Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T
#115As a bystander directly immune to the fortunes of AI going up or down, it does feel like there are a lot more people thinking this is inning 9 of the LLM story than there are people thinking it's inning 3. Which makes it tempting to believe it's probably closer to inning 3.
Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T
#116Has anyone seen a definitive mathematical proof of this? I have seen countless articles and exposes about the hidden debt. These are incredibly sophisticated companies so presumably they wouldn’t let themselves get into a company ending bind. But what are the chances this is actually an MBS type situation where the system is truly overloaded and a few sacrificial lambs are needed?
I mean, it is. Coreweave for example is very clearly a sacrificial lamb. FWIW Enron was also a „sophisticated company“ at the time
Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
> As a bystander directly immune to the fortunes of AI going up or down Sorry to break it to you but you are neither immune nor a bystander to the fortunes of AI going down. You are part of it all whether you like it or not.
You're not breaking anything to me. I deliberately phrased it as "directly immune" because I have no financial stake in AI-related companies. Obviously a debt-bomb of any type imploding reverberates across the economy.
so zero exposure to any popular index? Even “ex-US” is tsmc and sk-hynix in a trenchcoat. I think it was BHP exclaiming that theyre an AI play because they cover 85% of the raw materials in DC build outs.
In the current mania “no financial stake in AI-related” is a very bold claim.
Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T
#118As a bystander directly immune to the fortunes of AI going up or down, it does feel like there are a lot more people thinking this is inning 9 of the LLM story than there are people thinking it's inning 3. Which makes it tempting to believe it's probably closer to inning 3.
Can you convert that analogy to European?
Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was there for the Great Recession, and they were indeed in the public discussion. I remember the year 2007, as a 20 year old anti-capitalist, I was counting days until the economic crash. As predicted by plenty of left-wing economists at the time. The only people who didn’t see it coming were the capitalists who were invested in the inflated market, and had bought into pseudo-scientific economic theories that serve…
This is a bit of a "broken clock is right eventually" sort of thing, though. I could say without any evidentiary basis "there will be a financial crisis" for years and eventually be right, but I don't think it would be fair to say that I predicted it in a meaningful way. The details matter.
Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do I get zero direct and indirect stock market exposure, no electricity price impact, no RAM or GPU price impact, etc? I'd love to live in a world where AI firms bidding these things up doesn't affect me but I'm really struggling to understand how they aren't impacting the market.
be poor (minus electricity, I guess)