Live data from Hacker News

AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T

fortune.com

111–120 of 188 posts

Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was there for the Great Recession, and they were indeed in the public discussion. I remember the year 2007, as a 20 year old anti-capitalist, I was counting days until the economic crash. As predicted by plenty of left-wing economists at the time. The only people who didn’t see it coming were the capitalists who were invested in the inflated market, and had bought into pseudo-scientific economic theories that serve…

I was too - and to be frank: it's dishonestly revisionist to say this was a topic in the public eye. There's a very good reason a book (and movie) like The Big Short was such a big hit. It's because it was about the handful of people who actually saw the crash coming and were confident enough to put their money and reputation on the line.

The entire left wing of the political spectrum saw this coming (except social democrats; whom I don’t consider left wing). And if you were shorting stocks to make money of off this, you probably were not left wing. Additionally, left wing economists get plenty of ridicule from main stream capitalists no matter what they say, so there really is no reputation to either earn nor to keep.

Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T

#112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Internet didn't disappear after the dotcom crash, but a lot of money did. This is what could happen here I think.

unfortunately, the dotcom ate just money; the housing crash ate money and people. This will be some combination of the two; I wouldn't doubt a few pension funds in the deep red states get crushed if it takes money and property with it.

[dead]

Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You have any examples? Because all of the biggest and most famous crashes were events that only a very small minority of people ever saw coming. Tulips, 1929, Dotcom, Great Recession, 2010's Flash Crash - none of these were in the public discussion before they happened.

I was there for the Great Recession, and they were indeed in the public discussion. I remember the year 2007, as a 20 year old anti-capitalist, I was counting days until the economic crash. As predicted by plenty of left-wing economists at the time. The only people who didn’t see it coming were the capitalists who were invested in the inflated market, and had bought into pseudo-scientific economic theories that serve…

This is a bit of a "broken clock is right eventually" sort of thing, though. I could say without any evidentiary basis "there will be a financial crisis" for years and eventually be right, but I don't think it would be fair to say that I predicted it in a meaningful way. The details matter.

Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T

#114
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fiber and railroads don't depreciate after 3 years of use like AI chips. Fiber and railroads don't need tens of billions of dollars in continuing yearly maintenance expenses to keep them from going stale.

The "3 years" figure has been repeated endlessly and yet the same H100s are making today roughly what they did in Jan 2024...

How long does a train track last? Does a fiber optic cable last? Both are greater than 30 years, both will persist (relatively well) without use, and the benefits of scrapping or removing them are minimal. This allowed future companies to take advantage of them. Even if GPUs running at high load last five years, if the data center they are in goes bankrupt (because the AI bubble bursts), it’s likely they’ll be stripped and sold to make way for more productive CPU-based uses and to recover some of the cost of the bankruptcy. The surrounding buildings and infrastructure will have longer use, but it doesn’t translate to a net future benefit with AI.

Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T

#115

As a bystander directly immune to the fortunes of AI going up or down, it does feel like there are a lot more people thinking this is inning 9 of the LLM story than there are people thinking it's inning 3. Which makes it tempting to believe it's probably closer to inning 3.

[dead]

Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T

#116
post #13
post #12

Has anyone seen a definitive mathematical proof of this? I have seen countless articles and exposes about the hidden debt. These are incredibly sophisticated companies so presumably they wouldn’t let themselves get into a company ending bind. But what are the chances this is actually an MBS type situation where the system is truly overloaded and a few sacrificial lambs are needed?

I mean, it is. Coreweave for example is very clearly a sacrificial lamb. FWIW Enron was also a „sophisticated company“ at the time

Enron committed serious fraud, and not because what they did was made illegal after the fact. Unless I'm missing something, none of the big AI companies have committed serious fraud (or at least, not any that's been revealed).

Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> As a bystander directly immune to the fortunes of AI going up or down Sorry to break it to you but you are neither immune nor a bystander to the fortunes of AI going down. You are part of it all whether you like it or not.

You're not breaking anything to me. I deliberately phrased it as "directly immune" because I have no financial stake in AI-related companies. Obviously a debt-bomb of any type imploding reverberates across the economy.

> I have no financial stake in AI-related companies

so zero exposure to any popular index? Even “ex-US” is tsmc and sk-hynix in a trenchcoat. I think it was BHP exclaiming that theyre an AI play because they cover 85% of the raw materials in DC build outs.

In the current mania “no financial stake in AI-related” is a very bold claim.

Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T

#118

As a bystander directly immune to the fortunes of AI going up or down, it does feel like there are a lot more people thinking this is inning 9 of the LLM story than there are people thinking it's inning 3. Which makes it tempting to believe it's probably closer to inning 3.

Can you convert that analogy to European?

It’s like when the quarterback throws one last Hail Mary to a receiver in the endzone and people are betting on an interception

Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T

#119
post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was there for the Great Recession, and they were indeed in the public discussion. I remember the year 2007, as a 20 year old anti-capitalist, I was counting days until the economic crash. As predicted by plenty of left-wing economists at the time. The only people who didn’t see it coming were the capitalists who were invested in the inflated market, and had bought into pseudo-scientific economic theories that serve…

This is a bit of a "broken clock is right eventually" sort of thing, though. I could say without any evidentiary basis "there will be a financial crisis" for years and eventually be right, but I don't think it would be fair to say that I predicted it in a meaningful way. The details matter.

I don‘t think so. These predictions were explicit, and were tailored around the economic situations at the time. As you sibling mentions, even some capitalists made the same predictions (or they believed the left-wing economists) and were able to profit off of this.

Re: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do I get zero direct and indirect stock market exposure, no electricity price impact, no RAM or GPU price impact, etc? I'd love to live in a world where AI firms bidding these things up doesn't affect me but I'm really struggling to understand how they aren't impacting the market.

be poor (minus electricity, I guess)

Sorry, who do you think is going to pay for the bailout? The rich? Don't make me laugh
Post reply on HN