Live data from Hacker News

Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days

marlerblog.com

151–160 of 283 posts

Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Restaurants don't even have to track and disclose what allergens their food contains.

It's crazy how nothing has been done in the US about this. I got an egg allergy in my late 20s, I had never thought about it before and now eating at restaurants is such a hassle. Even the delivery apps seem to have zero affordances for food allergies, at least with a restaurant you can get some assurance by asking the staff.

You might like the UK. The place is wall to wall with allergen lists.

Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days

#152
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

DOGE will be seen by historians as the cause of so many crisis…

optimistic, this requires the arc of history to bend towards non-fascism.

Fascism always collapses, the question is only how much will remain by the time that occurs.

Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days

#153
post #85

> The CDC Has a Cyclospora Lab. DOGE Downsized It Last Year [1] [1] https://www.wired.com/story/cdc-cyclospora-lab-doge-downsize...

From 11 to 3 employees. Doesn't seem that outrageous outside of such a time of crisis (since this lab seem dedicated solely to outbreaks, not research), which is when the parent entity should temporarily allocate more people.

> From 11 to 3 employees. Doesn't seem that outrageous outside

I hope I never have you as my manager If you think a ~70% reduction in head count isn't outrageous.

Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days

#154
post #3

Marketing blogspam by an ambulance chasing attorney who stands to make a lot of money from this if public perception moves a certain way.

engaging with the identity of the arguer rather than the argument. 5 yard penalty, loss of down.

Sportsball reference, permaban?

There's nothing wrong with "engaging with" the identity of someone when their identity is both reprehensible and negates any impartiality.

Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

what would make you think that a downsized lab can do the same amount of work

What would make you think this would have prevented the incident?

Man shoots himself in the foot then turns up limping, it's probably not that his shoes are too tight.

Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days

#157
post #85

> The CDC Has a Cyclospora Lab. DOGE Downsized It Last Year [1] [1] https://www.wired.com/story/cdc-cyclospora-lab-doge-downsize...

From 11 to 3 employees. Doesn't seem that outrageous outside of such a time of crisis (since this lab seem dedicated solely to outbreaks, not research), which is when the parent entity should temporarily allocate more people.

The thing about crises is by the time you’re in them, they’re gonna cost way more to clean up than just not getting there in the first place.

Sounds like the lag time between going from 11 to 3 employees and having an outbreak was ~a year, so unless this is wrapped up fast enough and cheaply enough to cost less than 8 FTEs, we didn’t save a whole lot of money and we caused a whole lot of distress, so it’s hard to really call this a win.

Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days

#159
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

DOGE will be seen by historians as the cause of so many crisis…

optimistic, this requires the arc of history to bend towards non-fascism.

Yeah, as Norm Macdonald put it:

> “It says here in this history book that luckily, the good guys have won every single time. What are the odds?”

Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days

#160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

what would make you think that a downsized lab can do the same amount of work

They’re not thinking. They like the cuts, and DOGE, and musk, and the feel of that boot coming down on the neck. So they’re making post hoc rationalizations for everything.

It’s certainly not motivated by principles or a concern for reality.

Post reply on HN