Earlier quoted context omitted.
What would make you think this would have prevented the incident?
[flagged]
Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
141–150 of 283 posts
Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are food labels required to identify where they're sourced from? I don't think so?
The new QR codes (to replace the 2D UPCs) that manufacturers and merchants are moving to will contain source information and even which lot it came from.
If companies have a way of obscuring this info to end consumers while still meeting FDA obligations, they absolutely will, as they currently do for things like the information for companies who "Make" products right now, which are often holding companies meant to obscure business relationships.
Oh, and any human readable value will be obscured behind a QR code anyway, so all the humans who already do zero investigation to understand where their stuff comes from will continue to have no extra information.
Strict labeling laws around protected terms is an essential thing because so many people read nothing more than the packaging itself when shopping. All chicken lists "No hormones" as an advertisement despite that being law and no chicken sold will ever have those hormones.
Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
#143Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
#144Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m very sorry to hear that, but I don’t think restaurants have to be forced to deal with that. The only thing I could support is “if revenue >X then allergen disclosure is mandatory”. I know personally multiple little shops that had to refuse customers, because that’s extra hassle and responsibility that they can’t afford to deal with.
Do you also think businesses shouldn’t need to be “forced” to deal with accessibility? Web devs shouldn’t be forced to deal with accessibility either right?
But if you want every restaurant to be forced into labeling, you will see the small restaurants claim all the allergens are used and they cannot protect against cross contamination.
Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
#145Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
optimistic, this requires the arc of history to bend towards non-fascism.
Well, there will at least be historians in other countries covering the downfall in detail, if there is indeed a bigger downfall than has already happened. Democracies are pretty good at studying the failures of other countries and learning about them.
I’m not at all convinced about this part.
Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
#147Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
#148I went to restaurant last night and asked where the chicken was sourced from and their response was "it's not the usual place we get chicken, but it's US Farm Raised Hatched", but I misinterpreted the her answer as a distributor name but then I realized even if I had a name, I probably couldn't figure out past that whether or not these chickens were pasture raised. If food labels are law, why doesn't this apply to wh…
Are food labels required to identify where they're sourced from? I don't think so?
Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
#149Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Should" or "are required to?"
Regulations are minimal compared to what most consumers would want and expect. https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/cool
And here we are.