Live data from Hacker News

Gemini Robotics 2 brings whole body intelligence to robots

deepmind.google

51–60 of 584 posts

Re: Gemini Robotics 2 brings whole body intelligence to robots

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Hell, the only ones that can afford them will be the same that would hire human household help. But maybe they'd rather deal with a robot than a human?

Honestly: why?

Less liability?

Re: Gemini Robotics 2 brings whole body intelligence to robots

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Hell, the only ones that can afford them will be the same that would hire human household help. But maybe they'd rather deal with a robot than a human?

Honestly: why?

Robots don‘t steal and don‘t want a raise.

Re: Gemini Robotics 2 brings whole body intelligence to robots

#55
post #35

Robotics with AI is the real revolution. Today, humans convert their labor to capital. Capital holders need labor (humans) to acquire more capital. When the price of inference for these robots becomes less than the price of labor then capital holders don’t need labor. Obviously, AI impacts non-manual labor too, but a significant portion of the world population does manual labor.

and this is good?

If all goes well, imagine a world in which you work because you want to not because you have to.

Re: Gemini Robotics 2 brings whole body intelligence to robots

#56
Relevant: A San Francisco company is advertising humanoid robot housecleaning services[1]. However those 'bots require local supervision and a human controller watching through its video feed.

Presumably that company could use the Gemini Robotics product to eliminate the remote controller.

[1] https://www.tau-robotics.com/

Re: Gemini Robotics 2 brings whole body intelligence to robots

#58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Hell, the only ones that can afford them will be the same that would hire human household help. But maybe they'd rather deal with a robot than a human?

Honestly: why?

The list of plausible answers is long enough as to question why you felt the need to include the word honestly, irony? One example: social anxiety.

Re: Gemini Robotics 2 brings whole body intelligence to robots

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Hell, the only ones that can afford them will be the same that would hire human household help. But maybe they'd rather deal with a robot than a human?

Honestly: why?

I don't want a person I don't know very well in my space.

That aside: if I'm lucky enough to find a person who's good and reliable, they might move away, switch jobs etc.

It has all the headaches that come with hiring and managing someone, because, well, it is exactly that... If I don't want to be a manager at work (been there done that, happy to let others do it and get the raise that comes along with it), I sure as heck don't want to do it at home.

Re: Gemini Robotics 2 brings whole body intelligence to robots

#60
post #40
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For house keeping tasks the robotics companies love showing off... it honestly doesn't matter if it takes a robot longer than a human to clean your house. As long as it gets done before you get home from work, no big deal.

I'm bearish that they'll be economically viable in the house for a very long time. For businesses the bar for adoption is very low: If the thing can work repetitive jobs for 24 hours a day and replace 3 shifts, the purchase bar is nominally anything less than 3 x human salary if your budgeting horizon is 1 year. That's a high number, and probably fairly easy to achieve. For homes, it's a very different bar. You'd hav…

>You'd have a hard time convincing most American families to purchase anything with a >$1000 price tag.

Like cars, they'll likely purchase them through finance deals, with a monthly payment. Or perhaps even rent/lease them.

Post reply on HN