Live data from Hacker News

RFC 8890 – The Internet is for End Users (2020)

mnot.net

11–20 of 45 posts

Re: RFC 8890 – The Internet is for End Users (2020)

#11

Inevitably the internet will have two types of users: 1. The anti-bot bots that must stop you from proceeding, because they aren't entirely sure you aren't a bot and 2. The bots that can get past them, which we all must eventually deploy, if we want a chance to visit a web page

Why would anyone ever want to solve 99 Cloudflare captchas a day if you can get a bot to do it instead?

Literally used an LLM to answer the latest one 20 minutes ago, which was "what can climb a tree".

Cloudflare is a blight on the internet, but HN loves it.

Re: RFC 8890 – The Internet is for End Users (2020)

#13
post #2

Who's an end user. Unless you own your hardware, you aren't the end user. When your phone, tv, camera, or even laptop on a non-free OS is on your network, you can get some semblance of control by controlling what network services it uses. Things like DoH are part of the removal of my control as a home user and give it to Sony, or Apple, or TPLink The most obvious thing is it becomes harder to block adverts. Throw in…

I do share your actual concern, but I think the term 'end user' applies to any human sitting in front of a computer, trying to achieve something, independently of whether the effective sysadmin works against his interests or not.

Right, it's not about property, it's just about whether the computer is helpful to the immediately available human or whether it serves some remote one.

Re: RFC 8890 – The Internet is for End Users (2020)

#14
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would anyone ever want to solve 99 Cloudflare captchas a day if you can get a bot to do it instead?

Literally used an LLM to answer the latest one 20 minutes ago, which was "what can climb a tree". Cloudflare is a blight on the internet, but HN loves it.

Cloudflare just started blocking Googlebot, so maybe we'll see an exodus away from Cloudflare by people who want their sites indexed? Hopefully?

Re: RFC 8890 – The Internet is for End Users (2020)

#15
post #3

The internet is for whoever wants to send bits to each other and is willing to pay for transit to do it. The WWW might be for end users, though that seems less obvious by the day.

Right. The RFC is attempting to clarify the IETF's official position. The IETF is not the internet police, and can't make other actors obey.

We can make our own internet though - with blackhack and jookers.

Re: RFC 8890 – The Internet is for End Users (2020)

#16
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Literally used an LLM to answer the latest one 20 minutes ago, which was "what can climb a tree". Cloudflare is a blight on the internet, but HN loves it.

Cloudflare just started blocking Googlebot, so maybe we'll see an exodus away from Cloudflare by people who want their sites indexed? Hopefully?

I thought Google Search is dead, everyone is using ChatGPT now to find information.

Re: RFC 8890 – The Internet is for End Users (2020)

#17
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Literally used an LLM to answer the latest one 20 minutes ago, which was "what can climb a tree". Cloudflare is a blight on the internet, but HN loves it.

Cloudflare just started blocking Googlebot, so maybe we'll see an exodus away from Cloudflare by people who want their sites indexed? Hopefully?

[deleted]

Re: RFC 8890 – The Internet is for End Users (2020)

#18
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would anyone ever want to solve 99 Cloudflare captchas a day if you can get a bot to do it instead?

Literally used an LLM to answer the latest one 20 minutes ago, which was "what can climb a tree". Cloudflare is a blight on the internet, but HN loves it.

> but HN loves it

There is popular sentiment on HN that CF is making internet worse by being a core infrastructure element most websites use.

Re: RFC 8890 – The Internet is for End Users (2020)

#19
This is why ideology is so important.

Is the end user viewed as an ISPs client? a consumer of tech companies?

The idealistic language is fine but isnt based on any scientific approach to society. Its neutral at best.

The internet is for end users, but how if its not "by end users"?

If most protocols and standard implementations depend on adoption by ISPs and tech companies what does it mean to be "for the end user"?

Is prison architecture "for the prisoners"?

So how do we solve the "by end users" dilemma?

Post reply on HN