Live data from Hacker News

Why do we think we understand the world more than we actually do?

thedecisionlab.com

31–40 of 74 posts

Re: Why do we think we understand the world more than we actually do?

#31

I'm only here to first say I'm not like everyone else I do know things and can explain how things work. And computers work by making rocks think by putting magic smoke in them.

Sounds delightfully like something the Chongqing Punk would say

Re: Why do we think we understand the world more than we actually do?

#32

I'm only here to first say I'm not like everyone else I do know things and can explain how things work. And computers work by making rocks think by putting magic smoke in them.

I can confirm that I've let the magic smoke out of multiple electronics parts, and they almost always stop working, afterward.

Re: Why do we think we understand the world more than we actually do?

#33

Everyone should be required to sign up for a year of being followed around by an inquisitive child who will pockmark the landscape of their knowledge with exploratory boreholes. I have multiple environment and science degrees and feel generally knowledgeable and my oldest will put on his best Feynman face and be entirely unsatisfied when I offer and explain “Rayleigh scattering.” I love it. I love it so much. I love…

100 percent can relate on the relentless curiosity of a child. I was dumbfounded yesterday by this question -> if cars go at high speed, and breaks stop it suddenly, how come the friction doesn't generate enough heat to start a spark?

They actually might spark if the materials of the brakes weren't purposefully chosen to avoid a mini firework show when you suddenly brake.

Oof, the guy who went into the definition of sparks actually makes me realize this question branches off into so many different rabbitholes.

Re: Why do we think we understand the world more than we actually do?

#35

Everyone should be required to sign up for a year of being followed around by an inquisitive child who will pockmark the landscape of their knowledge with exploratory boreholes. I have multiple environment and science degrees and feel generally knowledgeable and my oldest will put on his best Feynman face and be entirely unsatisfied when I offer and explain “Rayleigh scattering.” I love it. I love it so much. I love…

On a somewhat related point, a lifestyle blogger & parent had coined the "fourth question" theory of sorts a few years ago - that, the fourth follow-up question a young child asks generally requires the parent to attempt to explain the meaning of existence, universe, and the like. I have also found this to be true.

Re: Why do we think we understand the world more than we actually do?

#36
It's the unknown unknowns:

"As we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say, we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns - the ones we don't know we don't know."

An excellent quote from Donald Rumsfeld, despite being an absolute cunt.

Re: Why do we think we understand the world more than we actually do?

#37
post #18
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Generally, it is people with a lower ability to understand the world that overestimate their own intelligence because they are unable to imagine anyone being smarter than them, and those on the smarter end who underestimate their own intelligence because they believe everyone else must be able to see what they are able to see. There was a paper, quite famous now, on the topic titled "Unskilled and Unaware of It: How…

I feel like hearing this is dangerous in itself - even if you overestimate yourself, surely you yourself don't overestimate yourself as much as others? Personally, I ran against a closed glass door yesterday. All I hope for is that I was entertaining to onlookers at least.

Don’t be so hard on yourself; the poorly designed glass door did that for you already.

Re: Why do we think we understand the world more than we actually do?

#38
post #35

Everyone should be required to sign up for a year of being followed around by an inquisitive child who will pockmark the landscape of their knowledge with exploratory boreholes. I have multiple environment and science degrees and feel generally knowledgeable and my oldest will put on his best Feynman face and be entirely unsatisfied when I offer and explain “Rayleigh scattering.” I love it. I love it so much. I love…

On a somewhat related point, a lifestyle blogger & parent had coined the "fourth question" theory of sorts a few years ago - that, the fourth follow-up question a young child asks generally requires the parent to attempt to explain the meaning of existence, universe, and the like. I have also found this to be true.

I love it. Where else can I give a jumbled mostly-ok explanation of the standard model and cosmology until the other persons brain turns off from overstuffed-boredom and not get fact checked?

Re: Why do we think we understand the world more than we actually do?

#39
post #35

Everyone should be required to sign up for a year of being followed around by an inquisitive child who will pockmark the landscape of their knowledge with exploratory boreholes. I have multiple environment and science degrees and feel generally knowledgeable and my oldest will put on his best Feynman face and be entirely unsatisfied when I offer and explain “Rayleigh scattering.” I love it. I love it so much. I love…

On a somewhat related point, a lifestyle blogger & parent had coined the "fourth question" theory of sorts a few years ago - that, the fourth follow-up question a young child asks generally requires the parent to attempt to explain the meaning of existence, universe, and the like. I have also found this to be true.

> the meaning of existence, universe, and the like

And the child will be too young to accept 42 as a satisfactory answer...

Re: Why do we think we understand the world more than we actually do?

#40

Everyone should be required to sign up for a year of being followed around by an inquisitive child who will pockmark the landscape of their knowledge with exploratory boreholes. I have multiple environment and science degrees and feel generally knowledgeable and my oldest will put on his best Feynman face and be entirely unsatisfied when I offer and explain “Rayleigh scattering.” I love it. I love it so much. I love…

> pockmark the landscape of their knowledge with exploratory boreholes

I've got a PhD in particle Physics. I develop the geometry module of machine tools.

I got lost when an auntie tried to explain crochet to me.

Post reply on HN