Live data from Hacker News

US citizen charged after GrapheneOS phone wipes during airport search

techspot.com

521–530 of 1001 posts

Re: US citizen charged after GrapheneOS phone wipes during airport search

#521
I think a wiser approach for crossing a border might be to have another phone with regular Android installed on it, so it doesn't look suspicious, and then connect remotely to your main phone. Before crossing the border, you would just need to remove the remote-connection app, and after crossing, install it again.

Re: US citizen charged after GrapheneOS phone wipes during airport search

#522
post #423

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, this also has the advantage of speed perhaps. I can see, deleting specific apps (and their data) as thing #1, and thing #2 would be certain directories. Of course, the problem is, are icons going to be vanishing off the home screen, when the agent is looking at it? Or will the unlock -> screen coming on, be super slow? Of course the problem there is, many people have an app store installed, and app stores have h…

Note that in the USA and a few other jurisdictions, I believe there is now a recognized possibility for the border agents to ask for access to your social media, so even wiping the phone, or even traveling without a phone, is not entirely safe.

As far as facts go I was thinking of this one case:

... where I seemed to recall it was a social media post, but it is unclear whether it's private messaging, public social media, or private messaging under a public social media account.

[EDIT] according to [1] it was on WhatsApp with a U.S national.

My understanding is that refusal to provide social media accounts, or passwords to devices, or passwords to social media accounts, can be considered suspicious in its own right and ground to be held in custody for further exam, and/or denied entry; foreigners do not get to have the same "give password" == "right to not incriminate yourself" that U.S of A. citizen have. In doubt I would assume I don't.

[0]: https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2025/03/20/f...

[1]: https://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2025/03/22/le-r...

Re: US citizen charged after GrapheneOS phone wipes during airport search

#523

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wouldn't say you are overreacting at all. I know someone who was detained for months on US soil after a phone search where the only "evidence" against him they found is illegal content sent by someone else to him on a group chat he doesn't even check. Had to get a lawyer and spend time in prison just waiting to be deported back.

What is illegal content in this context?

Jokes about Supreme Leader Trump?

(I'm not the person you replied to, I have no idea)

Re: US citizen charged after GrapheneOS phone wipes during airport search

#524

Ultimately, when you choose to enter a duress PIN that will wipe your device, you have to recognize that choice may have legal consequences. I don't like the amount of power our government has at the national border when it comes to detaining and pressuring citizens, but our Constitution explicitly grants it at least some of the power it now exercises in that context. If your threat model includes US state actors at…

Have the duress PIN on sticker on your phone. Maybe put it backwards and don’t say anything to border patrol. Have them try it out and erase the phone and then you can legitimately say you didn’t do anything and they did it themselves.

I wouldn't write it down, I would just make it 1234. They're bound to try that. Then they have absolutely no case against you.

Re: US citizen charged after GrapheneOS phone wipes during airport search

#525
From the article, I saw this:

    > According to court testimony, federal agents had already circulated his name and photo internally, saying he was under investigation for "suspected terrorism activities" because of his alleged association with the movement against Cop City.
I didn't know about Cop City, but I found this on Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cop_City

This part is interesting to me:

    > RICO conspiracy indictment

    > In September 2023, sixty-one people who had been arrested in the forest or at stop cop city protests were charged with racketeering under Georgia’s RICO law. This indictment is likely the largest criminal conspiracy case ever filed against protestors in the US.

    > As of April 2025, the racketeering case was stalled. Defendants in the case maintained their innocence and reported difficulty getting work and other hardships while they awaited trial for more than 20 months. In September, all RICO charges were dropped. Judge Kevin Farmer found that the Georgia Attorney General did not have the authority to bring RICO charges in the case.
From my outside view, it looks like these investigations are nothing more than an attempt to suppress free speech and protests.

For anyone unaware, RICO is both a Federal law and a Georgia state law that stands for: "Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations". It is used to take down mafia, gangs, organized crime, etc. It is a bit sad to see state prosecutors trying to use this against protesters.

Re: US citizen charged after GrapheneOS phone wipes during airport search

#527
post #459

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just don't travel to the US.

I live in the U.S. (as, I think, does the person who is the subject of this article).

Maybe change your location then :P

Re: US citizen charged after GrapheneOS phone wipes during airport search

#529
> US citizen charged after GrapheneOS phone wipes during airport search

> It's concerning – and sends the message that [GrapheneOS] is criminal by default

What's with this sensationalism? The GrapheneOS phone didn't just wipe itself - the defendant actively took steps to wipe it. The defendant isn't being prosecuted "by default" for having a GrapheneOS phone. He is being prosecuted for what he actively chose to do with that phone.

If your argument is that the search and seizure was unconstitutional, and you're within your rights to wipe your data, then argue that. I'm very sympathetic to such arguments. But stop with this "they prosecuted me for having a GrapheneOS phone" misdirect

Re: US citizen charged after GrapheneOS phone wipes during airport search

#530

Earlier quoted context omitted.

PIN to wipe seems suspicious. How about a PIN where it login to a patriotic profile and phone looks like normal android.

This is exactly my setup with GrapheneOS. The default / main profile is patriotic, with a sterilized Telegram account, state-adjacent banks and apps, etc. The second profile (that uses a separate PIN) is not so patriotic: it has foreign bank apps, crypto apps, password manager, 2FA app, personal records, and an alternate Telegram account that I use to discuss any potentially unpatriotic topics with potentially unpatr…

It's absurd that you have to do this and/or be so careful. But if you live in Russia, China, or another dictatorship, then I understand.
Post reply on HN