Live data from Hacker News

Safari Technology Preview 248 Released

webkit.org

51–60 of 85 posts

Re: Safari Technology Preview 248 Released

#51
Safari is the only real opposition to Google based browsers at the moment. Yes Firefox is a contender, but it has no brand traction among non-power users. Google has the brand, Safari has the defaults and energy efficiencies of the growing Apple laptop/desktop market. Although not open source, I trust it far more that a Google based browser as Apple - aside from PWAs competing with their App Store - has no real incentive to commodify, restrict or surveil the web like Google does.

Re: Safari Technology Preview 248 Released

#53
post #23
post #10

Since they nixed uBlock Origin Safari has not been a serious web browser to me. No amount of technology can make up for it.

https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts

This doesn't solve the problem. The whole point of uBO is that it plays the cat and mouse game between adblocking and anti-adblocking.

If you are OK with sites blocking you when you use an adblocker then there's a multitude of other options.

Re: Safari Technology Preview 248 Released

#54
post #31

Please add way to maximize the window. I rage quit when it goes fullscreen or just tall.

Try option-click on the green icon in the app window. It’s well hidden and unintuitive, but I think it does what you want.

option click does not fully maximise!

Re: Safari Technology Preview 248 Released

#56

Safari is the only real opposition to Google based browsers at the moment. Yes Firefox is a contender, but it has no brand traction among non-power users. Google has the brand, Safari has the defaults and energy efficiencies of the growing Apple laptop/desktop market. Although not open source, I trust it far more that a Google based browser as Apple - aside from PWAs competing with their App Store - has no real incen…

> aside from PWAs competing with their App Store

Yeah. Aside. Let's just ignore that Apple intentionally prevents users from using the browsers most needed feature for the common user today killing it just like they killed Flash.

Re: Safari Technology Preview 248 Released

#57

Safari is the only real opposition to Google based browsers at the moment. Yes Firefox is a contender, but it has no brand traction among non-power users. Google has the brand, Safari has the defaults and energy efficiencies of the growing Apple laptop/desktop market. Although not open source, I trust it far more that a Google based browser as Apple - aside from PWAs competing with their App Store - has no real incen…

> aside from PWAs competing with their App Store Yeah. Aside. Let's just ignore that Apple intentionally prevents users from using the browsers most needed feature for the common user today killing it just like they killed Flash.

Intentionally how? Mobile Safari has pretty broad support for PWAs: https://pwascore.com

Re: Safari Technology Preview 248 Released

#58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's because the EU is forcing competition on them for iOS Safari, and iOS Safari shares code with MacOS Safari. Now they have to at least try to keep up.

I am OOTL - How does the EU force competition in this context?

The EU passed laws to force Apple to allow other browser engines to run. Previously, all iOS browsers were reskinned WebKit by Apple decree.

Re: Safari Technology Preview 248 Released

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> aside from PWAs competing with their App Store Yeah. Aside. Let's just ignore that Apple intentionally prevents users from using the browsers most needed feature for the common user today killing it just like they killed Flash.

Intentionally how? Mobile Safari has pretty broad support for PWAs: https://pwascore.com

It does not. It doesn't support the installprompt event and hides the "add to home screen" behind 4 actions/clicks to make sure the users don't easily install PWAs.

Re: Safari Technology Preview 248 Released

#60

Safari is the only real opposition to Google based browsers at the moment. Yes Firefox is a contender, but it has no brand traction among non-power users. Google has the brand, Safari has the defaults and energy efficiencies of the growing Apple laptop/desktop market. Although not open source, I trust it far more that a Google based browser as Apple - aside from PWAs competing with their App Store - has no real incen…

> aside from PWAs competing with their App Store Yeah. Aside. Let's just ignore that Apple intentionally prevents users from using the browsers most needed feature for the common user today killing it just like they killed Flash.

On macOS i use Safari for PWAs. It is just fine.

But I use Firefox as my primary browser. PWA support non-existent. They killed their basic PWA support many years ago. There are suggestions they will support it in the future.

On Linux/Windows, I use Brave for PWAs.

Post reply on HN