Live data from Hacker News

Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber

blog.google

591–600 of 616 posts

Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber

#591
post #71

Pelicans for 3.6 Flash and 3.5 Flash-Lite (Cyber isn't available to me through the API yet.) https://tools.simonwillison.net/markdown-svg-renderer#url=ht...

impressed at the look (not the geometry) of 3.6 lol at flash-lite could not find your posts about them

Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber

#592
post #573

Man I love Gemini models but these kind of pricing increase is just insanse. I have a little product and I have to keep increasing the price and reduce the limits because of this non-sense, and they did not even let us use the old models in near future, so I forced to update to the new model with basically no to little improvement because I don't even need that much. Google if you can read this, it okay to release ne…

What is your use case? Have you considered moving to open source / Chinese models? If gemini-2.5-flash-lite is good enough for your application, you will find even lower cost options with better performance outside of the Google ecosystem.

I can't, my main task for it was translation, and no other models in the world can keep up with the multilang support like gemini models, because, no other company in the world has the multilang dataset like google and there might never be one, because google has been collected the internet data for it search engine since the 90s already. And so much has been lost in the history of internet and I doubt there any other company in the world that can go back in time to get those data back.

Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber

#593

Man I love Gemini models but these kind of pricing increase is just insanse. I have a little product and I have to keep increasing the price and reduce the limits because of this non-sense, and they did not even let us use the old models in near future, so I forced to update to the new model with basically no to little improvement because I don't even need that much. Google if you can read this, it okay to release ne…

Do not base products on models that are not open-weights. Doing it is like building a product on someone else's platform, you are entirely at their mercy, and even when they don't have any reason to hurt you, you are tiny enough that if any policy they want to enact hurts you as a side effect, no-one is going to care. You don't have to self-host the open-weights model, you just need to be able to source it from multi…

I just have no choice. My application was tested and benchmarked against a lot of models, but no model can be in the same league as gemini in term of multi-language support and understanding.

Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber

#594

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm in the same situation. But I was shocked discovering it goes both ways: many new Gemini functionalities are only accessible using a consumer account instead of a Workspace account. Also, Gemini is now the only major AI assistant with no support for MCP connectors. Instead of adding this to the core product, like ChatGPT and Claude did, somebody at Google decided that it was smarter to add this fundamental feature…

i think Google would see more success if they kept the CEO and everyone at the bottom (ie. doesn't manage anyone), and fired everyone else. Build a whole new management tree - the current people all do a terrible job.

I think almost every company would benefit from that.

Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber

#595
post #569

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why was this flagged? This is absolutely true, Americans seem to not actually want to use Chinese models at least for coding, maybe for other inference use cases but I haven't seen it. No one I know uses anything but OpenAI and Anthropic even if Chinese models are better or cheaper in many use cases.

First 6 of the most used models on openrouter currently are Chinese; that's true for code generation and other coding-relevant tasks too when ranked by share of tokens. https://openrouter.ai/rankings#top-models Of course openrouter is not representative because most users directly go to the model provider but it still proves your claim is very far from "absolutely true".

A big slice of a small pie does not prove the majority. And I'm speaking as someone who is indeed a user of those OpenRouter Chinese models.

Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber

#596
post #79
post #71

Pelicans for 3.6 Flash and 3.5 Flash-Lite (Cyber isn't available to me through the API yet.) https://tools.simonwillison.net/markdown-svg-renderer#url=ht...

I am growing tired of these pelicans posts every time a new model is published. Feels to me like low effort personal brand promotion. Just sharing my 2 cents.

I want to start a new benchmark: "hacker news commenter saying they are tired of pelicans on bicycles" :D

Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber

#597

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> But why people choose to bring the mediocrity of Google into their lives is beyond me. Because life gets simpler and better if you are just using what is available on your phone and in your browser instead of constantly chasing current HN darling.

That’s one braindead strawman. There’s millions of apps to choose from on your phone. Alternatives to Google are decades old. But do enjoy getting your ass profiled in gmail and let me know if the ads in your mailbox are helpfully tailored to your needs and preferences!

> There’s millions of apps to choose from on your phone

And choosing one of them obviously makes life more complicated than not doing that.

> getting your ass profiled

Gmail knows nothing of my ass.

> let me know if the ads in your mailbox are helpfully tailored to your needs and preferences!

I couldn't, for I don't check them. I have enough life to live without degoogling crusade.

Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber

#598
post #569

Earlier quoted context omitted.

First 6 of the most used models on openrouter currently are Chinese; that's true for code generation and other coding-relevant tasks too when ranked by share of tokens. https://openrouter.ai/rankings#top-models Of course openrouter is not representative because most users directly go to the model provider but it still proves your claim is very far from "absolutely true".

A big slice of a small pie does not prove the majority. And I'm speaking as someone who is indeed a user of those OpenRouter Chinese models.

this is the first mention of a 'majority' so certainly looks like a moving goalpost

Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber

#599
post #493

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It says the original report was in the Information, which I can't see, but I'm skeptical that they includes the training cost? And how much that changes the figure?

That's the profit margin on inference, not overall. Each model does end up being profitable over its lifetime, but the money they're making is being immediately churned into buying more data centers & the training for the next giant model up, so they're not profitable overall at the moment. It's a bit like how Amazon kept churning their profits into more growth instead of taking the profit early. That said, Anthropic…

It's crazy how much bigger OpenAI is than Anthropic.

Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber

#600

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> China can keep up because it's cheaper to run a frontier lab there Not sure if this is what you meant, but their training runs are significantly cheaper. This was one of the big shockers from the Deepseek R1 paper. US foreign policy has helped to ensure that the Chinese are compute constrained, so they literally cannot buy the most expensive and powerful training rigs. This has led to a steady drumbeat of innovatio…

I’ve often thought it was the cost of electricity and crypto mining being banned a few years ago. China has a lot of “stranded electricity” which fits this usecase well.

Checks out. China has 10,000 TWh, the US only has 4,000.
Post reply on HN