Live data from Hacker News

Xiaomi-Robotics-1

robotics.xiaomi.com

281–290 of 347 posts

Re: Xiaomi-Robotics-1

#281
post #78
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Ahah you AI bros can't stop talking about Claude and llm, and telling stories of how great it was that one time, even when they are not the topic at hand. > I've built multiple successful businesses in the last year. If you're doing this right you don't need your employer anymore. Right

Rolled my eyes at "I've built multiple successful businesses in the last year". This person is clearly in some sort of manic state.

Re: Xiaomi-Robotics-1

#282

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> You're telling me we've finally got robots that can do our laundry? Did you watch it actually fold that shirt? Super slow and bad at it.

Is a Chinese robot vacuuming and mopping my floor every day? Yes it is. Could I do it better manually? Absolutely. I still prefer the robot to do an ok job than to do it myself.

The difference is that vacuuming seven times as often can compensate for a less effective process. Folding 7 times doesn't eliminate wrinkles.

Re: Xiaomi-Robotics-1

#283

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's also relevant that China isn't open sourcing results because that's something China will do forever on some philosophical grounds. They do it because it is currently in the best interests of the Chinese state (and the world, as it turns out, coincidentally) but as soon as that stops being true there is zero chance it'll continue to be open source.

So I'm supposed to hate this because of what China MIGHT do in a future neither you nor I can predict?

Is there someone saying you should hate something?

If we want open source technology we should recognize that the current arrangement is non sustainable - the moment china doesn't have an american AI industry foil to play against it'll immediately close. It's up to the US to build more open source models. We already own the content used to train them, collectively. We should own the results as well. Make the big AI companies release weights.

Re: Xiaomi-Robotics-1

#284

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's possible to intelligently discuss the merits of Chinese society and also acknowledge that it's a brutal autocracy. Making some kind of equivalence of the two in terms of the rights of the individual is so ridiculous that nobody is going to take anything you say after that seriously, you do your arguments a disservice by doing it.

The rights of which individuals? You’re familiar with nspm-7, right?

The fact that this text still exists alone is enough to prove my point.

Re: Xiaomi-Robotics-1

#285
post #110

I think this robot is really well-made! Xiaomi seems to be quite controversial these days, but personally, I still really like the brand.

Got two Xiaomi phones in a row, one in 2018 for 250 euros (note 8 pro) and one in 2023 for 300 (13T) and I liked them a lot. My gripe with the second one is lowish battery life, it always bites me on longer trips when my gf's Pixel 8 lasts considerably more, but was also way more expensive. Will check battery reviews better next time I shop for a phone, I don't care much for the rest.

I just can't deal with all the ads on Xiaomi phones. Switched over from Chinese phones, still remember my JiaYu G4 fondly, to Samsung few years ago where the situation is a bit more bearable

Re: Xiaomi-Robotics-1

#286

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well. I already decided some time ago that I don't want to have my money go into US corporations as long as the orange King is living out his genocidal fantasies (and even without that, I am already annoyed to no ends about Apple, Microsoft, Facebook and Google abusing everyone else so blatantly and violently, including buying legislation - look at the mandatory age sniffing movement before you can access information…

Genuinely curious, who is Donald Trump genociding? Or am I misunderstanding what you mean by "genocidal fantasies"?

Palestinians? Israelis are loathe to admit it but that country wouldn't last a year without support- from non Jews!

Re: Xiaomi-Robotics-1

#287

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure what the :/ implies, but if you're disappointed by your own folding techniques, spend a bit of time on it, look up some guides, and fold clothes with purpose. or something. (Rise up against the machines! Folding your own clothes is an act of resistance!)

I've always taken :/ to be a kind of hopeless dejection mixed with apathy. In this case, it seems to convey their disappointment in their skills as well as the futility of improving

I read it as an acknowledgement that while improvement is possible, the requisite effort will in reality never be expended

Re: Xiaomi-Robotics-1

#288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"the future where robots do everything" and "unemployment" are the same thing

Yes but unemployment where a small cadre of rich elites own the robots and the rest of us are serfs is very different from the public owning and benefiting from the robots in the form of strong social services and UBI.

If everyone is a serf who buys the products that the elites want to sell?

Re: Xiaomi-Robotics-1

#289

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is a Chinese robot vacuuming and mopping my floor every day? Yes it is. Could I do it better manually? Absolutely. I still prefer the robot to do an ok job than to do it myself.

The difference is that vacuuming seven times as often can compensate for a less effective process. Folding 7 times doesn't eliminate wrinkles.

No one cares about wrinkles anymore. Come on let's be real.

Re: Xiaomi-Robotics-1

#290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The difference is that vacuuming seven times as often can compensate for a less effective process. Folding 7 times doesn't eliminate wrinkles.

No one cares about wrinkles anymore. Come on let's be real.

Apparently not given how many comments in opposition I got.
Post reply on HN