Earlier quoted context omitted.
being an exec at apple for decades you probably pick up on a few things, even if they're beyond your department
The Luce seems to disprove that, at least in his case.
Apple targets dozens of OpenAI employees with legal letters
161–170 of 414 posts
Re: Apple targets dozens of OpenAI employees with legal letters
#162Everybody wants a platform but nobody wants to spend what it takes to make a platform. That includes things like Windows Phone, Fire Phone, all the glasses, Humane, etc. As much as everybody hates on OpenAI for chaotic management, they did buy Jony Ive and are presumably giving him everything he wants to build a platform for them. Even though it probably only buys them a 20% chance of success, they haven't doomed the…
I increasingly see AI investment, generally speaking, as a lost cause. It has very little chance to pay off.
Re: Apple targets dozens of OpenAI employees with legal letters
#163FT frames this as some aggressive escalation tactic, but document retention letters are extremely standard practice. At this point they're basically a formality, as any former Apple employee at OpenAI really ought to know by now that they could get dragged into this. Hold letters can be aggressive if you send them before you've even filed a complaint, but if anything, Apple is late to the party with these.
They’re not late to the IPO party, which was postponed by OpenAI, It may turn out that that was a mistake. OpenAI probably should’ve gone ahead, particularly in light of the pending court case.
Also Apple could have filed the litigation right before the IPO and after a IPO announcement. OpenAI doesn't get to decide when Apple sues them.
Re: Apple targets dozens of OpenAI employees with legal letters
#164Everybody wants a platform but nobody wants to spend what it takes to make a platform. That includes things like Windows Phone, Fire Phone, all the glasses, Humane, etc. As much as everybody hates on OpenAI for chaotic management, they did buy Jony Ive and are presumably giving him everything he wants to build a platform for them. Even though it probably only buys them a 20% chance of success, they haven't doomed the…
AI model providers have zero "moat", clients change them as they see fit. This week ChatGPT, next week Claude. The real value is and going to be in hardware - as long as China doesn't enter the GPU/RAM race. I increasingly see AI investment, generally speaking, as a lost cause. It has very little chance to pay off.
Re: Apple targets dozens of OpenAI employees with legal letters
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just to be clear, these are letters to individuals about the existing lawsuit with OpenAI, not new lawsuits against individuals.
> these are letters to individuals about the existing lawsuit with OpenAI, not new lawsuits against individuals My guess is these employees weren’t chosen randomly. If they refuse to coöperate with Apple, they’ll get personally sued as well. And the reality of the matter is, given Altman’s public persona and reputation, there is a good chance an AG somewhere starts looking at whether these folks broke any laws.
This isn't law and order and that's not how civil litigation works.
Re: Apple targets dozens of OpenAI employees with legal letters
#166Everybody wants a platform but nobody wants to spend what it takes to make a platform. That includes things like Windows Phone, Fire Phone, all the glasses, Humane, etc. As much as everybody hates on OpenAI for chaotic management, they did buy Jony Ive and are presumably giving him everything he wants to build a platform for them. Even though it probably only buys them a 20% chance of success, they haven't doomed the…
A decade ago Uber seemed poised to be the big tech powerhouse. Maybe not a platform per se (certainly not an ecosystem as other companies had it) but a major provider of software for all kinds of verticals beyond their core business. What happened to that?
Re: Apple targets dozens of OpenAI employees with legal letters
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some people think that being the exclusive supplier of iOS based devices is a “monopoly”.
McDonald's is the exclusive supplier of Big Macs and McNuggets. They're a monopoly.
Re: Apple targets dozens of OpenAI employees with legal letters
#168Everybody wants a platform but nobody wants to spend what it takes to make a platform. That includes things like Windows Phone, Fire Phone, all the glasses, Humane, etc. As much as everybody hates on OpenAI for chaotic management, they did buy Jony Ive and are presumably giving him everything he wants to build a platform for them. Even though it probably only buys them a 20% chance of success, they haven't doomed the…
Re: Apple targets dozens of OpenAI employees with legal letters
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
McDonald's is the exclusive supplier of Big Macs and McNuggets. They're a monopoly.
In and Out Burger is an even bigger monopoly, the way they organize themselves is unfair to the rest of their competition.