The amount of slop in the replies is just sad.
Evidence of inconsistencies in evaluation process and selection of winners
11–20 of 338 posts
Re: Evidence of inconsistencies in evaluation process and selection of winners
#12Re: Evidence of inconsistencies in evaluation process and selection of winners
#13[flagged]
I think Ed Zitron has this market covered already
Re: Evidence of inconsistencies in evaluation process and selection of winners
#14Sadly, the major ML/AI/NLP conferences are being inundated with AI slop papers. That will arguably have a bigger impact on the quality of research moving forward.
Re: Evidence of inconsistencies in evaluation process and selection of winners
#15"I think you just need to accept the results of the competition. The winning submissions clearly provide value and had a lot of effort invested in them. I'm not really worried about a few inconsistencies or mistakes if the value is still there. Did you think another submission deserved to win over these?"
That comment is gold. Yeah, I'm not worried about hallucinated slop, just accept it was the winner folks.
Re: Evidence of inconsistencies in evaluation process and selection of winners
#16[deleted]
Re: Evidence of inconsistencies in evaluation process and selection of winners
#17[flagged]
AI is extremely useful, we just haven’t zeroed in on your specific use cases yet. Robotics has been transformed by it, IT and tech has been transformed by it. Finance and Legal have been transformed by it. To say it’s 95% useless is a personal bias. To me it’s 65% useful. As it can run in the background doing “chores” while I sleep.
[dead]
Re: Evidence of inconsistencies in evaluation process and selection of winners
#18"I think you just need to accept the results of the competition. The winning submissions clearly provide value and had a lot of effort invested in them. I'm not really worried about a few inconsistencies or mistakes if the value is still there. Did you think another submission deserved to win over these?" That comment is gold. Yeah, I'm not worried about hallucinated slop, just accept it was the winner folks.
I can't stand this "if it provides value, that's all that matters" attitude. We could also try to avoid being useful idiots for a small handful of investor-darling corporations that have explicitly stated they seek to monopolize the market and put us all out of business/jobs.
Re: Evidence of inconsistencies in evaluation process and selection of winners
#19What's up with all the AI generated responses on that page?
Re: Evidence of inconsistencies in evaluation process and selection of winners
#20[flagged]
beep-boop, [citation needed] on that "95%".