Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

$100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

tryai.dev

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

171–180 of 581 posts

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#171

Post by altcognito »

beepbooptheory wrote: post #83
qurren wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm classically trained and I honestly can't really tell how these are worse than the human produced ones. They all look kinda the same to me.

Classically trained in music videos??

I'm seeing these type of comments a lot more. A type of comment where it seems like the "user" (commentor) makes a categorically wrong comment about the linked article that would be sort of right if it were a different medium. Clearly whatever was used here triggered on the "music" part, but didn't understand what the article was really about. Typically it goes beyond just not reading the article (as in this case)

I'd assume that it was a bad LLM take, but it looks like the rest of the comments are normal.

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#173

Post by mohamedkoubaa »

hackmack10 wrote: post #164
mohamedkoubaa wrote: post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"not great" is a huge understatement

It's sickening we're running out of compute for this shit lol. I don't blame the author though, it is what it is.

If it wasn't this it'd be for mining shitcoins.

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#174

Post by VohuMana »

BLKNSLVR wrote: post #129

This is how you do AI music videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Njk2YAgNMnE Lean into the not-quite-but-almost uncanny-valley-ness. Make it a feature, not a bug.

Along the same lines this one leans into it and makes something absolutely unique and wild: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dHAP3E5e2jc

Behind the scenes here: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UhOc0VXo7II

I agree though, you can combine art with AI and make something really unique but the majority of art people are pushing with AI is in my opinion being rightfully branded as AI slop.

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#175

Post by byzantinegene »

bjourne wrote: post #168
boca_honey wrote: post #165

I don't have a problem with AI and can't stand the anti-AI brigade, but... this is the worst thing I have ever seen in my life. This specific type of garbage is exactly what arms the anti-AI critics with valid arguments. We should really wait a few years for the technology to mature before releasing these kinds of projects into the cultural sphere.

Eh, I'd like to see YOU make a better music video for $100 or less!

or i can just not do it? this absolute garbage of a music video is not worth a single cent, let alone a $100.

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#176

Post by sneak »

boca_honey wrote: post #165

I don't have a problem with AI and can't stand the anti-AI brigade, but... this is the worst thing I have ever seen in my life. This specific type of garbage is exactly what arms the anti-AI critics with valid arguments. We should really wait a few years for the technology to mature before releasing these kinds of projects into the cultural sphere.

The article is not about video quality.

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#177

Post by runarberg »

bjourne wrote: post #168
boca_honey wrote: post #165

I don't have a problem with AI and can't stand the anti-AI brigade, but... this is the worst thing I have ever seen in my life. This specific type of garbage is exactly what arms the anti-AI critics with valid arguments. We should really wait a few years for the technology to mature before releasing these kinds of projects into the cultural sphere.

Eh, I'd like to see YOU make a better music video for $100 or less!

This is such a bad argument:

a) You are allowed to dislike cheap stuff, in fact it is common in western culture to dislike art where it is obvious that the artist cheaped out.

b) Never in the history of western art critique has there been a requirement that the critic is able to do better then the artist (let alone for cheaper). As the saying goes, “I may not be able to pilot a 100000 ton cargo ship, but I can tell when one is stuck in a canal.”

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#179

Post by Lerc »

boca_honey wrote: post #165

I don't have a problem with AI and can't stand the anti-AI brigade, but... this is the worst thing I have ever seen in my life. This specific type of garbage is exactly what arms the anti-AI critics with valid arguments. We should really wait a few years for the technology to mature before releasing these kinds of projects into the cultural sphere.

If you benchmark is to be better than a human familiar with the task at hand, then you will be disappointed.

If you are not expecting them to be as good as people then their failures seem wholly unremarkable. The specific nature of tbe failures can be quite interesting in fact. They can expose deficiencies in the architecrure, training data, or presumptiona of those controlling the models.

In my experience very few people are claiming the capabulities that would be required for me to expect them to produce better than they currenrly are.

I'm not bothered by a fish's inability to quote Shakespeare.

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#180

Post by stale2002 »

byzantinegene wrote: post #175
bjourne wrote: post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Eh, I'd like to see YOU make a better music video for $100 or less!

or i can just not do it? this absolute garbage of a music video is not worth a single cent, let alone a $100.

What do you mean, I thought it was fun.

Feel free to not make your own music videos, but I am not sure why you would be so upset about other people having fun.

Post reply on HN