Honest question here: What does this mean for Anthropic's OPenAI's rumored IPOs?
Anthropic could go either way. My guess is that if the financials aren't Enron scale flaming garbage, they'll be fine.
261–270 of 302 posts
Honest question here: What does this mean for Anthropic's OPenAI's rumored IPOs?
Anthropic could go either way. My guess is that if the financials aren't Enron scale flaming garbage, they'll be fine.
“Shocking nobody” I would add… This is an obvious Musk scam and anyone with financial knowledge called it as such ever since it’s been on the table. Why else lobby and change the NASDAQ listing rules for instance?
This is shaped like more-or-less every IPO I've seen. I think you have to wait for more of a collapse to claim dispositive evidence of a scam (or widen your claim to 'almost all IPOs are scams').
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah that plus wrapping the xAI dogshit debt inside SpaceX is where it gets really scummy. At least the S&P500 didn't (yet) succumb and lower their requirements and that's where most of my investment money is parked.
not to mention hiding all the Twitter losses inside of xAI because AI in general loses lots of money.
There's also the Tesla (potential) self dealing where SpaceX bought a bunch of Cybertrucks and appears to be leasing them to employees for cheap as a perk.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What you describe is exactly a scam: he somehow convinced you that he's not motivated by wealth! That alone is clearly a scam, the idea that Musk is not motivated by huge amounts of wealth and high valuations is just implausible considering g his behavior at every single turn.
What is he doing with all that wealth? Taking lavish vacations? Buying luxurious yacht? Buying islands and making bunkers?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And I don't understand why a serious media outlet is covering this at all. The entire article could be irrelevant the next day. Without any actual, meaningful news coming out of the company (important financial update, new product, bankruptcy etc), stock price moves are only meaningful to day traders, not anyone who is doing serious investing. LA Times is making themselves the same as CNBC or sources you find on Yaho…
Because anti-Elon thinking is a thing that really seems to impact the judgement of some people and this kind of news really gets them to engage
My understanding is that an ideally priced IPO should not move much from the opening price in the near term. If it pops it means they left money on the table. If it drops, then I am not sure what the implication is exactly? Now I think SpaceX is massively overhyped, but is the share price returning to IPO opening not just a sign that the banks accurately estimated something?
I mean who knows where it will end up by the end of the year. Meme-stock-hype train could continue or it could reasonably crash far further back down to earth.
“Shocking nobody” I would add… This is an obvious Musk scam and anyone with financial knowledge called it as such ever since it’s been on the table. Why else lobby and change the NASDAQ listing rules for instance?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
LOL. I'm not American, I chose Aramark at random because... ... Aramark has the same revenue as SpaceX: https://companiesmarketcap.com/largest-companies-by-revenue/... You've just told me that "the financials of an incompetent commercial food service provider" are better than those of SpaceX. Aramark is profitable and SpaceX is wildly unprofitable[1] :-))) * * * [1] Almost nothing SpaceX does points at SpaceX scaling…
Lol I meant "incumbent", that was a STT typo. But yes I get the point. My own point is that even a good-faith honest IPO for a spaceflight company probably won't look anything like Aramark. It's always going to be a bet on technology, not a share in the predictable profit stream of a boring company that serves pizza in school cafeterias.