Live data from Hacker News

SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

zdnet.com

221–230 of 1001 posts

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Same. I bought a cabin, which had the equivalent of pretty good DSL. I got starlink and immediately cancelled it when 2gbps fiber arrived 9mo later. Fiber is rolling out faster than a lot of people think.

Would fiber have come so fast without starlink as a threat though

Thanks Elon!

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#222

Earlier quoted context omitted.

light pollution already means the night sky is largely invisible outside of remote areas

“You can’t see it most places so who cares if it goes away” is my most charitable interpretation of this.

I've never seen a glacier before, have you?

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#223
post #213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not but it's all so tiresome to explain why. Also, those (hypothetical) towers have no ROI because they only serve poor people. Starlink covers the entire world so parts of the world can subsidize service to other parts.

> It's not but it's all so tiresome to explain why I'd really love to hear it. Obviously you aren't obligated to provide an explanation but if someone else does it, I'm all ears. > Also, those towers have no ROI because they only serve poor people So why are they being built at all?

Towers aren't ever going to be built to cover the most rural areas. That's why Starlink is needed.

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#224

Will this be the last generation to remember the night sky?

light pollution already means the night sky is largely invisible outside of remote areas

“Remote areas” make up most of the world.

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#225

soooo good that they'll burn up one day and this nonsense can finally end. investors provide infinite capital to nonsense projects so that the showman can create an endless show that will attract new nonsense capital. sorry but already in rural morocco they have 200 mbit internet for 20 bucks a month. Yes there are some 6 wheeled vehicles roaming the planet that might really benefit from these 100k satellites. but fo…

"...we're good." ? It seems that you are excluding all of the actual users onboard with Starlink tech. I'm one. I had choices and Starlink was a welcome addition to the short list. In a short time, Starlink proved to be that disruptive "invention" that changed everything. There are already millions of users. Nobody is forced to use Starlink. Yet here we are. Whether there are investors or not, a positive cashflow and…

curious where you live that starlink is the best option.

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#227

soooo good that they'll burn up one day and this nonsense can finally end. investors provide infinite capital to nonsense projects so that the showman can create an endless show that will attract new nonsense capital. sorry but already in rural morocco they have 200 mbit internet for 20 bucks a month. Yes there are some 6 wheeled vehicles roaming the planet that might really benefit from these 100k satellites. but fo…

> for 99.9% of everyone else? we're good! Well Starlink has 12 million subscribers, which is already more than 0.1% of the population, so clearly you are incorrect that 99.9% of people don't want it...

12 million / 8.3 billion => 0.0014 something. so.. 0.1% turns out to be correct. honestly i made the number up and accidentally nailed it

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#228
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But a significantly different makeup than plain old rock dust.

Citation needed.

I’m not sure that “we don’t make satellites out of rock and ice” needs a cite, but here you go.

https://research.noaa.gov/noaa-scientists-link-exotic-metal-...

> Niobium and hafnium do not occur as free elements in nature, but are refined from mineral ores. They are used in semiconductors and superalloys.

> In addition to these two unusual elements, a significant number of particles contained copper, lithium and aluminum at concentrations far exceeding the abundance found in meteorics, or ‘space dust.’ “The combination of aluminum and copper, plus niobium and hafnium, which are used in heat-resistant, high-performance alloys, pointed us to the aerospace industry,’’ Murphy said.

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#229

soooo good that they'll burn up one day and this nonsense can finally end. investors provide infinite capital to nonsense projects so that the showman can create an endless show that will attract new nonsense capital. sorry but already in rural morocco they have 200 mbit internet for 20 bucks a month. Yes there are some 6 wheeled vehicles roaming the planet that might really benefit from these 100k satellites. but fo…

Starlink was funded internally by SpaceX. What investors are you talking about?

those who buy & sell stocks & options & provide exit liquidity.

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#230

I think most of this thread is missing the part where this will also work for cellphones and give you truly global coverage.

* only when you’re outdoors with good line of sight and only in geographic areas they allow.

Wifi indoors, starlink outdoors
Post reply on HN