Live data from Hacker News

EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

patrick-breyer.de

431–440 of 947 posts

Re: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

#431

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Very reductionist comment- if you're an elected representative and you leave early to take a vacation knowing you'll be missing votes, you're not doing your job..

This. When I need to take my summer vacation, I need to request it to my manager in due time so the team can plan customer deliveries accordingly, and in my last day before leaving I need to do a handover of my open tasks to whoever will do the work in my absence. I can't just spontaneously decide one day that tomorrow I'm leaving for 2-4 weeks on vacation with no notice and no handover to my team. What's stopping ME…

Oh, so it's also your fault when you plan, and get approved a vacation, and then in the middle of it (lets's say on week 2 out of 4) you're notified that in two days you must be in the office, or, according to you, you should get canned?

Re: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

#432

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>This is a nice piece of democracy right here: this is just eu in a nutshell, the irish were made to vote on both nice and lisbon treaties twice (both were voted no in the first vote)

Any time now even the most pro-european EU defender will realise that what was once a trade union has slowly transformed itself into an undemocratic, bureaucratic monster.

Here in the UK, a large proportion of the population still think the EU is a good idea... Despite all the evidence proving otherwise.

Re: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

#433

Stupid parliamentary trick: Hold the vote on the day before the summer break - ensuring that many people have already returned to their home countries. Then use a sort of "reverse" parliamentary trick: the default is that this legislation is accepted. They needed an absolute majority - not of voting members, but of all members - to reject it. Result: 314 against, 276 in favor, 17 abstentions, 113 absent The EU is wel…

> It is shocking that 276 members of parliament would vote to support this. Are so many so naive? Or being paid off? There are a lot of countries in the EU that aren't shining beacons of democracy. The EU makes sense as an economic block but some of the countries in it are politically unaligned with what people think of when they think of the EU.

You really should check out the list of voters, you will be surprised who exactly voted "yes". The list can be found here: https://www.thatprivacyguy.com/blog/chat-control-the-415-who...

Re: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

#434
post #423

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> They didn't anticipate…the Middle East blowing up again Yes, interesting that the People dropping bombs did not anticipate blowing up. Our elites have revealed many flaws recently, but one I did not expect is that they have surprisingly limited intelligence.

EU did not dropped bombs.

But they dutifully support those who do, materially and diplomatically. Carrying significant political cost, internally as well as externally.

Re: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

#435

Stupid parliamentary trick: Hold the vote on the day before the summer break - ensuring that many people have already returned to their home countries. Then use a sort of "reverse" parliamentary trick: the default is that this legislation is accepted. They needed an absolute majority - not of voting members, but of all members - to reject it. Result: 314 against, 276 in favor, 17 abstentions, 113 absent The EU is wel…

> It is shocking that 276 members of parliament would vote to support this. Are so many so naive? Or being paid off? There are a lot of countries in the EU that aren't shining beacons of democracy. The EU makes sense as an economic block but some of the countries in it are politically unaligned with what people think of when they think of the EU.

Yea, like France or Germany or Belgium

You know Im right

Re: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

#437
post #176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In Canada, there's been a lot of talk about how immigration, "broke the Canadian consensus," around immigration as a good thing. The problem is, there never was a consensus around immigration. The Liberals own stats prove that. What there was was a consensus around multiculturalism and tolerance. Immigration itself, was always split evenly among three camps in Canada: those who want more, those who want less, and tho…

The promise (for the non-insane majority) was that immigration was going to save our economic bacon. That's the orthodox economist viewpoint after all. Well, it didn't. The minimum anyone would have to accept is that the economy went to shit while mass immigration was happening ... (in both EU and Canada). So I guess you don't have to accept causation, but they were happening simultaneously, so this reaction by the p…

[flagged]

Re: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

#438

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Jacques Baud (Swiss) and Xavier Moreau (French) citizens, got sanctioned by the EU[1] on the basis of "acting as mouthpieces for pro-Russian propaganda and spreading conspiracy theories". Sanctioning means asset freezes, debanking and travel bans, virtually a slow and painful sentence to homelessness and death since you won't be able to travel, have a bank account, a job, own or rent anything under sanctions. I don't…

>virtually a slow and painful sentence to homelessness and death

OK, do you have information as to how close to homelessness and death these two are? Based on my reading I'm unsure regarding Baud, but my impression is Moreau is probably not significantly affected.

Re: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

#439
post #195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What are you even saying? As a leftist, I want nothing to do with those fascists.

I have some bad news for you, the Chat Control was originally brought up by the left. Mainly by Ylva Johansson (Swedish Social Democrat, S&D group). Leftist origin via Johansson/S&D, but later sustained by mainstream centrists and now a watered down version is partly supported by conservatives too. Left fascism was not so long ago. Think of the woke hysteria, black lives matter, cancelling on twitter, people losing t…

Liberals are not leftists ffs. S&D are liberals, if you go to the wiki page you can see that they are labeled centre-left. Centre-left in this case stands for left wing of liberalism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Party_of_England_and_Wal...

This is an example of party which can be called leftist. It's actually even listed as that on wiki. Minimal condition in general is to be anti-capitalistic.

Re: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

#440

Every day I grow less enamoured with the EU project. More and more, the laws and regulations imposed upon citizens are hostile.

> the laws and regulations imposed upon citizens are hostile. Let's not forget that these laws are supported and pushed for by national governments in the EU Council, there's no shadowy cabal that materializes these laws out of thin air, the EU is a blame-laundromat for domestically unpopular laws passed through backroom deals

> there's no shadowy cabal that materializes these laws out of thin air

that's really cute

Post reply on HN