Live data from Hacker News

It seems that the age of reading might be a short anomaly in human history

theatlantic.com

91–100 of 349 posts

Re: It seems that the age of reading might be a short anomaly in human history

#91

“A Clockwork Orange” as “Old English” is an amusing anecdote, but it might be worth noting that the novel is written in deliberately nonstandard English mixing in Russian words, so it might be nontrivial to read for people lacking interpolation skills. In the first paragraph, e.g., there is: > There was me, that is Alex, and my three droogs, that is Pete, Georgie, and Dim. Dim being really dim, and we sat in the Koro…

Just wait till they open Trainspotting.

Re: It seems that the age of reading might be a short anomaly in human history

#92

I read more than ever, but Substack is taking a sizable share of the pie whereas lit and non-fiction is now my late evening. I don't do the audiobook thing, though I understand that has become increasingly popular yet not really given much credence. Desire might be theoretically limitless, but time and attention is not. Time I spend reading is time I'm not consuming endless short-form videos. People have gotten hooke…

[dead]

Re: It seems that the age of reading might be a short anomaly in human history

#93

We were in an age of reading? I gave up about 10 years ago on people as readers. I have recommended so many books and articles to software people over the years and it's honestly depressing how many people have told me they don't like to read. Like...you're a programmer? And you don't like to read? I assumed that people who enjoy software would be into intellectual stimulation but I've learned that this is wrong. Mor…

Programming probably is more intellectually stimulating than reading fiction novels.

As someone with a degree in literature, I'm gonna disagree there. It depends on both the novel and the programming.

Re: It seems that the age of reading might be a short anomaly in human history

#94

[flagged]

It's true; I also started reading the comments before clicking the article. Show of hands?

Well, you missed this:

>Of course, the new republic was not always a haven for sober analysis. The Founding Fathers attacked their enemies in the papers, spreading lies to incite the public against their opponents. One ally of Thomas Jefferson’s called John Adams “a hideous hermaphroditical character which has neither the force and firmness of a man, nor the gentleness and sensibility of a woman.”

Re: It seems that the age of reading might be a short anomaly in human history

#95
post #31

Even as the author points out people are reading more, he continues to conflate books with reading - and not just that but reading specifically physical books (referring to his stats around book ownership). The reality is that before, you needed to read huge swaths of information to find/know the relevant information. Now you don’t. The density of useful information I gather from places like Wikipedia, even long form…

> The reality is that before, you needed to read huge swaths of information to find/know the relevant information. Now you don’t. > The density of useful information I gather from places like Wikipedia, even long form articles is substantially higher than I got reading non-fiction. You're in good company. Sam Bankman-Freid: I would never read a book. I’m very skeptical of books. I don’t want to say no book is ever wo…

I do read huge swaths of information, just directly relevant to the questions that I have, and the things required to understand that information.

Don’t have to read a book on every US president to understand what happened during the Reagan administration. And if I’m primarily interested in the Cold War, I can focus on that subject and skip out on when Reagan was governor of California, or how he met his wife.

More than that I can get information from a variety of sources, including ones that disagree with each other and have different perspectives. That has absolutely enormous value when trying to comprehend something new…and isn’t often available in a single book.

You still can’t be lazy. Laziness is antithetical to truly acquiring knowledge. But it definitely can’t only come from a book.

Re: It seems that the age of reading might be a short anomaly in human history

#96
post #11

I refuse to believe that the decline of our education system is some inevitable, intractable problem.

Decline since when? A few hundred years ago most people were illiterate farmers.

Were they though? Or were they only illiterate because literacy was measured in Latin not their native language? We know that historically that did happen, and it is hard to figure out what was done.

Even today, most talking about literacy rates are using a very high level read skills to make things look bad, when most people can read just fine for the normal level things are written in. I'm near illiterate if you only test me on medical papers.

Re: It seems that the age of reading might be a short anomaly in human history

#97

We were in an age of reading? I gave up about 10 years ago on people as readers. I have recommended so many books and articles to software people over the years and it's honestly depressing how many people have told me they don't like to read. Like...you're a programmer? And you don't like to read? I assumed that people who enjoy software would be into intellectual stimulation but I've learned that this is wrong. Mor…

Can you recommend me a book to read?

Theft of Fire is my favorite book in the last ten years for sure.

https://devoneriksen.com/products/theft-of-fire-orbital-spac...

Re: It seems that the age of reading might be a short anomaly in human history

#98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cinema is dying? Hollywood is on track to have its best year since 2019. Where do people come up with this stuff?

Inflation adjusted outcomes and overall ticket sales down 30-40% Overall ticket sales Globally are down 46% since 2000. Please learn to tell financial engineering headlines from reality.

I'd suggest you do the same. You may want to believe that cinema is "dying", but none of the numbers support that argument.

Re: It seems that the age of reading might be a short anomaly in human history

#99

>Americans also get much less of their news through reading than they once did. In 1975, about half of 20-somethings said they read the newspaper every day. Today less than 10 percent do. Most of the news are not worth reading. I listen to news when eating, and I am very glad I don't have to waste my reading span on this crap.

I wish there was a local news paper around me. There are national news papers with a local edition, but they don't have local reporters digging into local stories and so are not worth reading.

Re: It seems that the age of reading might be a short anomaly in human history

#100
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Programming probably is more intellectually stimulating than reading fiction novels.

It’s not. Novels are fiction by the way.

Yes? What's so important about novels? They're a relatively recent innovation in literature.
Post reply on HN