Should I do the JS or Scheme SICP
Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Video Lectures (1986)
11–20 of 52 posts
Re: Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Video Lectures (1986)
#12Should I do the JS or Scheme SICP
I‘d go with Scheme. You‘ll learn the basics in a day. The language spec is only a few pages. And Scheme reads like pseudo-code with parentheses.
Re: Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Video Lectures (1986)
#13If you want to work through SICP, you can use MIT Scheme, but another option is to use Racket or DrRacket, with this add-on package: https://docs.racket-lang.org/sicp-manual/
Awesome!
I was just about to ask just that question?
Thank you, SM
Re: Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Video Lectures (1986)
#14I tried SICP straight from the book once, but I think the lectures are much better and the book acts as a supplemental reference.
That is indeed how University learning used to work, for about 1000 years
Re: Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Video Lectures (1986)
#15Should I do the JS or Scheme SICP
Scheme. Javascript is a fine language, but it is not the right tool for this job.
Re: Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Video Lectures (1986)
#16If you want to work through SICP, you can use MIT Scheme, but another option is to use Racket or DrRacket, with this add-on package: https://docs.racket-lang.org/sicp-manual/
MIT Scheme is the simplest thing that might work.
Re: Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Video Lectures (1986)
#17Should I do the JS or Scheme SICP
I have both books. Scheme for sure! Env setup can be a bit of an issue but it is doable. Regarding it, I remember having some weird issues with MIT Scheme on a modern computer, but Racket/DrRacket works well.
Re: Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Video Lectures (1986)
#18I always recommend these lectures, awesome!
Re: Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Video Lectures (1986)
#19I tried SICP straight from the book once, but I think the lectures are much better and the book acts as a supplemental reference.
That is indeed how University learning used to work, for about 1000 years
It's *supposed* to work.
In reality you get lectures from individuals that became professors because they are great at politics/research but not at teaching (very different skill).
If you even get them and not their 25 year old assistants.
And this is apparently super common even in ivy league universities as Youtube lessons have shown me over and over.
Re: Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Video Lectures (1986)
#20These 1986 lectures are the definitive SICP experience — the Hal and Gerry show at its peak. The presentation quality holds up remarkably well, and seeing the metacircular evaluator built live is something no textbook can fully capture. For those who find the book dense, these lectures provide the pacing and intuition that make the abstractions click.
LLM bot account