Live data from Hacker News

Every new car sold in the European Union must include a driver monitoring camera

allaboutcookies.org

581–590 of 1001 posts

Re: Every new car sold in the European Union must include a driver monitoring camera

#581

All new cars. At this point I don't know if I'd buy anything made after 2008. Whenever I rent a new car around here (in the EU) I find them very annoying. The worst is the cruise control that tries to stick to the speed limit -- but its sensors don't always read the signs very well, so you'll often slow to 50 km/h (about 30 mph) for no reason. Then there's the incessant beeping at you, "lane assist" that you can't tu…

The good news is that by making cars more trouble than they're worth, this may speed us closer to walkable, bikeable neighborhoods that can only be reasonably navigated on foot or by bike, connected by extensive public transit networks (which already do track where you're going).

Nah. It's giving votes to whatever politician promises to put certain regulatory regimes out to pasture. You may find that you like some of their other policies far, far less than "seeks to restrain creeping safetyism".

Re: Every new car sold in the European Union must include a driver monitoring camera

#582
post #66
post #26

1) Unplug the cellular modem. 2) Unplug the camera or put a piece of blackout tape over the lens. 3) Enjoy!

2.5) Your car doesn’t start 3) Enjoy I will start now but I think not for long. “For your own safety we disabled your car”.

> “For your own safety we disabled your car”

Drive onto freeway, `sneeze` directly at camera, car "disabled for safety", causes chaos on freeway (hopefully no one dies), sue car maker, retire

Re: Every new car sold in the European Union must include a driver monitoring camera

#583

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> IIRC, veering from the lane is the cause of most collisions, so it makes sense to have this. My dad's Toyota has this. The issue is it seems to have a hard time actually centering itself in the lane, so it'll just sway from side to side like a drunk driver if the lane is somewhat narrow. And you can forget about driving on secondary roads, which usually don't have markings on the sides. It'll keep trying to drive i…

> My dad's Toyota has this. The issue is it seems to have a hard time actually centering itself in the lane, so it'll just sway from side to side like a drunk driver if the lane is somewhat narrow. Newer cars (or other cars) do a better job of this. Mine doesn't do the ping pong - it really does keep it centered. However, the point is that it should direct you back into the lane and you're supposed to take over. If i…

Most highway exits in Ontario, Canada and some part of the US have highway exit ramps where the right lane widens into two, one exiting and one continuing. The two lanes are not marked until the buffer before the exit. What you have is essentially one widening lane.

The cruise control in my Hyundai is tied to the lane centering feature and this keeps forcing me onto exit ramps i do not intend to take. One time, it was quite aggressive during rain. The lane keep feature does not handle off-ramps in Ontario well at all.

The problem with these "safety" features is that they do not work reliably and do not handle edge cases well.

Re: Every new car sold in the European Union must include a driver monitoring camera

#584

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Laws for drivers written by people with chauffeurs. Not even that. They know the laws are stupid. They don't care. It's just another day at work for them. They're trying to surgically write laws to garner support/votes from shorsighted hand wringing Karens (plenty of examples in HN comments) while also not actually hurting industry/donors. So stupid rules and stupid beeps are what you get.

Anyone who's working on making driving a car unbearable has my vote! My bicycle has a single chime and it's manually operated.

giving up your freedom to limit others in the name of safety seems unwise.

too much control creates a generation behave like the kids.

Re: Every new car sold in the European Union must include a driver monitoring camera

#585

I hired a Chinese Haval Car for a weekend last year (Australia). It started beeping at me for being distracted because I was checking for traffic in the other lanes - which is crucial when driving in a 4 lane highway. Of cause, I had never experienced such a beep before, so I had to take my eyes off the road tp look at the screen to see what the reason for the beeping was. Then, on a multlane highway, I would indicat…

> would only ever move the speed up down to speeds that are divisable by 5.

I have a seething hatred for UX that forces every setting to be in nonsensical chunks for no reason. Bad designers somehow think that it's "simpler" but it's just not. It's pushy, annoying and disrespectful to users to presume you know what values they should prefer. A good UX designer can always find a way to let users fine-tune settings to suite their individual differences.

Re: Every new car sold in the European Union must include a driver monitoring camera

#586

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Laws for drivers written by people with chauffeurs. Not even that. They know the laws are stupid. They don't care. It's just another day at work for them. They're trying to surgically write laws to garner support/votes from shorsighted hand wringing Karens (plenty of examples in HN comments) while also not actually hurting industry/donors. So stupid rules and stupid beeps are what you get.

Anyone who's working on making driving a car unbearable has my vote! My bicycle has a single chime and it's manually operated.

I legit can't tell if this is sarcasm or not.

Re: Every new car sold in the European Union must include a driver monitoring camera

#587

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Driving4answers had a similar rant recently about the 2024 Prius, where there's an always-on warning beep every time you enter an intersection, which intrusively pulls away your attention in the exact moment when you need to be focusing on the road the most. I'll be surprised if it doesn't cause someone to die in the coming years. Laws for drivers written by people with chauffeurs.

> Laws for drivers written by people with chauffeurs. Not even that. They know the laws are stupid. They don't care. It's just another day at work for them. They're trying to surgically write laws to garner support/votes from shorsighted hand wringing Karens (plenty of examples in HN comments) while also not actually hurting industry/donors. So stupid rules and stupid beeps are what you get.

Women's suffrage was the stupidest thing humanity ever did. And the general populace is still not ready to admit the mistake, as proven by the expected incoming downvotes.

Re: Every new car sold in the European Union must include a driver monitoring camera

#588

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> incredible amount of killing from distracted drivers > 1.10 fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles traveled https://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/trumps-transpor... For reference, fatalities on bikes: > 9.32 fatalities per 100 million cyclist miles (6 deaths per 100M kilometers) https://www.calbike.org/urban-transportation-research-bike-f...

The first link is a propaganda website so not really much use, and for the second one, pretty much all fatalities on bikes are the result of being killed by distracted drivers. >The US has eight times as many pedestrian deaths per mile as Germany. Clearly the US is unusually bad for distracted driving.

The stats come from the government agency in the US which tracks driver fatalities.

Here's the source document: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/...

Regarding "distracted driving" causing cyclist fatalities, my point was more that bicyclists have a higher risk rate. If we're already going down this path for safety, banning bicycling would have a higher impact than reducing fatalities ~10% which is what the EU claimed it could prevent.

Regarding the claim that "pretty much all fatalities on bikes are the result of being killed by drivers", that's simply not true. It also largely depends on laws and location.

https://www.bikeattorney.com/bike-accident-common-causes.htm...

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2011/05/20/1364622...

Re: Every new car sold in the European Union must include a driver monitoring camera

#589
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And you can bypass a seatbelt warning by just plugging in a buckle without the belt, but most people don't bother. It's not worth the inconvenience to circumvent, so it still has a positive impact on safety.

Go in a car from 1970 and try the seatbelts. I can see why people didn't want them. I too would rather not have a stiff blade like plastic meterial nearly cut my head off everytime the car breaks. By comparison today we have luxurious silk strands that don't pinch anywhere.

I have a car from that era. The seatbelts feel like those in any other newer car I've been in, although perhaps a bit thicker.

Re: Every new car sold in the European Union must include a driver monitoring camera

#590

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Seatbelts are actually heavily enforced around the EU, most people would rather just belt up than pay the fine.

Toyota... When we look after a dog for a few days for a friend, it beeps. When I put shopping on the back seat, it beeps. Drives me wild. It "beep... beep... beep..." for a minute then "BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP". I wouldn't get another because of how annoying that is.

This is how you get many people to just keep the belts fastened permanently and not bother putting them around themselves.
Post reply on HN