Earlier quoted context omitted.
The issue with AI isn't that it can't write embedded code (though it is noticeably worse at it), the issue is specifically with the safety certification of code the AI produced. There is a lot of paper trail to show that you followed all relevant standards, a lot of which pertains to your development process. It is not just what you do or don't do in the code (e.g. MISRA or CERT C) but there is also a lot about how y…
Cant they just implement all the papertrail-generating and checkbox-checking and ass-covering into its instructions or harness?
Programmers need to start meditating
171–178 of 178 posts
Re: Programmers need to start meditating
#172Earlier quoted context omitted.
The people I'm talking about literally like coding for the sake of coding (many have shared comments here on HN about it in the past too), which I think is the same group who now are loosing their "passion for software engineering" as the LLM takes over the typing/coding part, but still leaves the design/intention to the human. But yes I agree, one does not equal the other, but if one person has one of those characte…
Weird. Ive seen the exact opposite. The LLM drones talking endlessly how to write fairly basic code using LLMs in a way that is not actually solving problems any quicker or more effectively but is doing it in a way that they see as "more modern". Ironically I don't think software engineering has progressed much at all since vibe coding got fashionable. Real, meaningful engineering advances are being drowned out by th…
Re: Programmers need to start meditating
#173Re: Programmers need to start meditating
#174It is also worth saying that you don't need to sit still to meditate. You can do yoga or go for a walk. Walking meditation is very underrated IMHO.
Re: Programmers need to start meditating
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
We shape the tools that in turn shape us.
True; I have seen the agentic workflow and I would rather not be shaped by it. It looks like absolute hell of constant distraction making it impossible to reach a state of flow.
I've bounced off Claude Code (et al) multiple times.
But very recently I've had some successes. With some bulk bug fixes, it felt the same as scripting data quality fix ups. With proof of concepts in mind, tried 3 very different ideas.
Two quickly flamed out, revealing that I needed to chew on those ideas (a lot) more. If we're measuring how to "fail faster", I'd score these as useful efforts.
But one has been a very unexpected delight to work on. Almost addictive, like coding feels when you're in the flow.
Any way. The current mania for coding harnesses is total insanity. Mario of Pi.dev fame is spot on and far more insightful and articulate than me.
Re: Programmers need to start meditating
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
It being boring is part of the point - normally your brain is constantly stimulated so it does indeed feel strange and uncomfortable when that stimulus is taken away. Pushing through that is what leads to progress. Meditation is like physical exercise, it's not exactly "fun" at the time, you sort of have to learn to enjoy it, but it's never easy. Like exercise the real reward is backloaded
This is exactly what the OP and I argue against, people insisting that it must be good for everyone. By the way the 'painful' part does more heaviy lifting there, not the boring. I've really tried a LOT during therapy and in some other situations. And it just doesn't work for me. Same with traditional exercise by the way. I can't do exercise in a gym (too empty) or have those 'gamification' goals, it must be more nat…
Re: Programmers need to start meditating
#177Re: Programmers need to start meditating
#178I can’t agree that meditation and flow are very equal. In fact they are rather the opposite: while being in the flow (of programming) means been absorbed by your thoughts and you are most likely not be aware of being aware or or being thinking. In most meditation practices the goal is to be aware of your thoughts and inner processes