So, I blinked and forgot to check for updates on this and they voted a few hours ago to reinstate this... https://www.heise.de/en/news/Showdown-in-Strasbourg-The-unex...
Chat Control 1.0 and 2.0 Explained
81–90 of 385 posts
Re: Chat Control 1.0 and 2.0 Explained
#82It's funny they thing criminals are using those platforms for discussion
Re: Chat Control 1.0 and 2.0 Explained
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Nobody in EU is saying the EU should clean up others' mess around the world That's literally what the top poster said. Your points make sense, "EU should reopen Hormuz" is laughable
Either the EU opens Hormuz or the EU pays twice the pre war rate for gas / oil indefinitely. Of course at least they can put the subjects that bitch about it in jail now.
Well everyone pays the same for oil (unless there are export/import control and adjusted by transportation costs) worldwide.
So americans will be paying 2x as well its just that some of that money will stay in the country instead of going to the middle easter or US (which happens to be the largest supplier of oil to the EU)
Back in 2025 EU imported ~15% from the gulf. China was over 40% and Japan at 95%...
Re: Chat Control 1.0 and 2.0 Explained
#84[flagged]
The party they want to ban are neo-Nazis.
Re: Chat Control 1.0 and 2.0 Explained
#85I don't understand. How does it affect encrypted messages? It seems like either you need: 1. allow MITM decryption by a privileged authority 2. require all devices doing E2EE have a non-user-modifiable piece of functionality to scan on-device The second is the Apple style on-device CSAM scanner? I have to say that I do sometimes think about it while taking a photo of my baby playing in the bathtub - photos like my pa…
You are correct in that both option 1 and 2 are possible. For end-to-end encrypted messages only option 2 is possible. The content will be scanned directly on your own device and the data will be sent to the authorities without your knowledge, if the software detects something suspicious. This is called client-side-scanning.
Re: Chat Control 1.0 and 2.0 Explained
#86Re: Chat Control 1.0 and 2.0 Explained
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
At this point I think it's obvious that EU is in turmoil. They're struggling to come to grips with the idea of a Russian invasion on their eastern borders, and simultaneously USA pivoting to Asia and not willing to front their defense after 40+ years of imploring them to do so themselves. They've outsourced nearly every critical component of a large sustainable society to the rest of the world: Russia, USA, China, In…
[flagged]
Well the Americans are not particularly clean in this situation. For them it's all about creating a situation where Europe keeps buying overpriced weapons from the US to support Ukraine in their slow march to death. Most euro leaders have sold their souls to the devil and live in a bubble of illusions and wishful thinking. They are all employees of the the American system. You won't even make it to the selection level it you don't comply with their ideas and morals. The only way out of this is a new wave that ditches the US completely and start doing business with Russia and China on a massive scale. Not gonna happen though.
Re: Chat Control 1.0 and 2.0 Explained
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Let's stop the blut and soil BS do you feel the same way when Africans speak of Africa?
I think less because I am not an african myself but yes, I guess it could ? Can you provide me with some example of something that you think I would not disapprove of and that amounts the exactly the same thing ? Or maybe can you try to defend the blood and soil rethoric (call it the way you want) instead of a drive-by comment ?
I'm just noticing that only European people seem to be disallowed from calling their land "their land" and outsiders "outsiders". it's "blut and soil", as if the men who fought Nazis fought Nazis for some high-minded ideals rather than their land and their people.
Re: Chat Control 1.0 and 2.0 Explained
#89[flagged]
Alternative for Germany (Alternativ für Deutschland, AfD) is a party that wants to revoke citizenship of brown people and expel them from the country. There are very good reasons they should be banned. Their opposition to chat control is completely incidental.
Re: Chat Control 1.0 and 2.0 Explained
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Political groups are factions of the Parliament, while parties are alliances of national parties at EU level, funded through the EU budget. Neither the group in the Parliament nor the lawmakers will face any consequence if ESN loses its status as a European party. It’s important to note the lawmakers stay in office even if the European party is banned. Europe is also not the US and from my knowledge it seems that t…
Unless they are doing something criminal their values are their and their voters business, regardless of how reprehensible they might be.
In Germany it is illegal to have Nazi-like values, such as wanting to expel all non-German people.