Live data from Hacker News

Mark Zuckerberg's biggest legal nightmare yet could cost Meta $1.4T

the-independent.com

91–100 of 194 posts

Re: Mark Zuckerberg's biggest legal nightmare yet could cost Meta $1.4T

#91
post #64

These types of lawsuits seem dangerous. But Meta is a pretty awful company and deserves some sort of comeuppance. I worry about what it leads to though. Hard cases make bad laws.

They are difficult lawsuits for sure! But that is because the status quo is already messed up.

These cases are going to bring up questions on content moderation, engagement, ad revenue, age verification, and a whole host of insane things that people don’t want to think about.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg's biggest legal nightmare yet could cost Meta $1.4T

#92
post #27

Meta is a symptom; the whole business is rotten. We've all heard the vocabulary: engagement maximization, a/b testing, emotional targeting, ad auctions, user surveillance, sentiment analysis. Children are not emotionally or intellectually prepared to repel this hostile takeover of their minds. Civilization needs to rein in all these terrible things corporations do to humans.

In all fairness social media is in the same kind of business model as porn and gambling. None of that is forced on anybody. If you don't want those in your life then just don't consume them. If you don't want them in your household use a DNS blocker. How much should we really parent the rest of society?

Sure, let your kids buy alcohol, cocaine and heroin in every shop there is. Then see how much it helps that you ban those at home.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg's biggest legal nightmare yet could cost Meta $1.4T

#93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The old adage applies to social media: "the medium is the message". You can't steer a ship whose whole purpose is crashing into icebergs from crashing into an iceberg. You're working against the whole purpose of the thing itself. Even if these engineers are Facebook were successful another, less idealistic, social media company would pick up the slack of promoting the clickbaitiest most sensationalistic content possi…

Social should and will get the tobacco treatment. Social media is detrimental to public health and will get regulated/taxed to the point the industry will become unprofitable.

I just worry that the wrong thing will be regulated/taxed. It's the combination of algorithmic feed + global reach + monetization potential that makes social media so nasty. But it's easy to create "social media" regulations that would apply to sites like this one, or old-school forums.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg's biggest legal nightmare yet could cost Meta $1.4T

#94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In all fairness social media is in the same kind of business model as porn and gambling. None of that is forced on anybody. If you don't want those in your life then just don't consume them. If you don't want them in your household use a DNS blocker. How much should we really parent the rest of society?

Law forbids my local administrative entities from engaging with porn and gambling. Yet they force me to use Facebook if I want to see events that are happening (and paid with my taxes). So, sorry, but the liberal ideal paradise of "let loose and people will choose" does not work in practice, at least where I live. I need some laws to force my less tech-savvy nearby citizens to make the right choices.

In order to follow clubs the local HS puts on you have to follow their Instagram account. They put the content/updates nowhere else.

"Need to be on IG dad so I can be active in extracurricular in HS."

Mandate APIs out and this problem goes away so folks can vibe code really simple solutions that keeps you off the site.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg's biggest legal nightmare yet could cost Meta $1.4T

#95
post #33

Unfortunately, I think we all know how this story ends. The company will settle for a slap on the wrist, a paltry fine that is but a fraction of the profit that was made as a result of the infraction. The company will not admit to any wrongdoing as a result of the settlement. The company will continue their behavior but in a stealthier, more obfuscated fashion.

You're forgetting some things which are quite sad and reflective of our society:

The CEO will not be personally affected at all. He'll still have hundreds of billions in the bank.

The CEO will be paraded in front of congress who will then proceed to ask him softball questions carefully prepared by a team of lobbyists and Meta lawyers. The CEO will answer like a robot.

Senators and congressmen will not push back on the CEO's answers even though everyone in the room knows said answers are deliberate obfuscation and dishonest wordsmithing at best.

The CEO will be praised by the Senate Minority Leader simply because the CEO is from the Senator's district.

The same Senator will highlight all the good work the CEO does to help the Israeli military. (this is not antisemitism, for the record. Senate Minority Leader Schumer has constantly said his main job is to protect Israel's interests).

The company's shares will increase, and everyone will praise the company and its CEO. Every major podcast, even those run by centrists and capitalist leftists, will praise the CEO's ability as someone who is incredible at delivering amazing returns.

Shareholders will allow the company to operate as normal, because they are making money.

The cycle repeats itself.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg's biggest legal nightmare yet could cost Meta $1.4T

#96
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I worked in the team at Facebook (2017-2019) relevant to this stuff. I saw (did not write) some of the documents cited. The rank and file engineers and designers and PMs doing the work were all morally correct people, working very hard all the time to steer the ship away from harm to normal people and toward establishing healthy relationships and media diet. We were consistently undermined and overruled by the Direct…

> The rank and file engineers and designers and PMs doing the work were all morally correct people Then why didn't they quit? I believe I could have gotten a job at Meta (and hey, maybe I'm wrong!) but I've never been able to stomach the idea of working on their products. If I can choose to avoid working on morally compromising things, why can't they? And look, I get it. If they didn't make it some other engineer wou…

Don’t worry, all employees were morally good people, who chose to stay and make millions from the harm to children they supposedly were resisting.

It’s not like meta was a charity. There was a lot of money being made by every one knowing the harm they were doing.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg's biggest legal nightmare yet could cost Meta $1.4T

#97

I actually like Instagram, primarily for the ads. Most people don’t buy VSTs( music production software plugins ). I spend at least 50$ a month on them. Sunday I spent an hour browsing instagram waiting for an ad to appear again. It wasn’t in my ad history for some reason. I found it and made a purchase. I think these types of sites can work, if users can strictly op into what they see. For the most part my instagram…

"I actually like the camel's design on the cigarette pack" is a surprising take in this thread, but I guess no product can get to billions of users without having many really happy users.

How do you find your niche VSTs ?

They don’t exactly advertise them on the evening news.

I’m too lazy to make it, but now I want a short form video platform that’s 100% ads.

Nothing else. Call it HonestSales.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg's biggest legal nightmare yet could cost Meta $1.4T

#98
post #27

Meta is a symptom; the whole business is rotten. We've all heard the vocabulary: engagement maximization, a/b testing, emotional targeting, ad auctions, user surveillance, sentiment analysis. Children are not emotionally or intellectually prepared to repel this hostile takeover of their minds. Civilization needs to rein in all these terrible things corporations do to humans.

In all fairness social media is in the same kind of business model as porn and gambling. None of that is forced on anybody. If you don't want those in your life then just don't consume them. If you don't want them in your household use a DNS blocker. How much should we really parent the rest of society?

> If you don't want those in your life then just don't consume them.

That works fine when the thing is neither addictive nor required for interaction with certain people you need to interact with.

I can avoid Meta specifically, but then again I also live in Germany and one of the language podcasts I listen to had the host complain about their bank telling them to communicate by fax next time they wanted to change their PIN.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg's biggest legal nightmare yet could cost Meta $1.4T

#99
post #27

Meta is a symptom; the whole business is rotten. We've all heard the vocabulary: engagement maximization, a/b testing, emotional targeting, ad auctions, user surveillance, sentiment analysis. Children are not emotionally or intellectually prepared to repel this hostile takeover of their minds. Civilization needs to rein in all these terrible things corporations do to humans.

> Children are not emotionally or intellectually prepared to repel this hostile takeover of their minds.

Then their parents shouldn't let them use the internet.

I find it interesting that so much of how people think about morality involves attributing free will unevenly. I.e. "facebook execs" are using their free will to addict people but those people have no ability to resist. It's so obviously corrosive to think something like "only evil people have free will; good people are just hapless victims".

Re: Mark Zuckerberg's biggest legal nightmare yet could cost Meta $1.4T

#100
post #65

I wonder exactly where everything kind of went south for Mark and his platform, or was this always the goal since Facebook's inception

It went south around this point:

    Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard
    Zuck: Just ask.
    Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS
    [Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?
    Zuck: People just submitted it.
    Zuck: I don't know why.
    Zuck: They "trust me"
    Zuck: Dumb fucks.
I don't know why anyone trusted anything that came out of Zuckerberg's mouth for the last 20 years.
Post reply on HN