101–110 of 140 posts
Lol, all the people squawking about how this means nothing and this is a worthless project amuses me. A lot of people just don't see it yet. This is coming for literally everything and it is so exciting. The next decade is going to be awesome.
What's so exciting about your software being made of code nobody can or wants to understand?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> when it's vibed it works, until it doesn't and then it's really hard to make it work again Is it? People have solved AI bugs with AI. If some vibe project eventually hits some bug and stops working, what exactly stops using AI to fix it? Is the idea that bugs will go beyond the limits of AI capability? If you meant to say that when an AI vibe coded project beyond some complexity it's difficult for a human coder to…
AI will simply code you into an architectural corner where you can’t get out of without a refactor.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Even if it does cost thousands (does it? I genuinely have no idea how to scope such a thing) that might be a good price if a custom compiler to your custom target is something you really want. People have paid far more for far less. I wouldn't spend $100K in tokens to get a custom bare metal Python. Or even $10K. And I'd guess that most devs wouldn't either, unless they spend $10K like it's nothing. People that hav…
your first mistake is thinking this would cost that much. with DS4 this might cost far less than 1k imo
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> when it's vibed it works, until it doesn't and then it's really hard to make it work again Is it? People have solved AI bugs with AI. If some vibe project eventually hits some bug and stops working, what exactly stops using AI to fix it? Is the idea that bugs will go beyond the limits of AI capability? If you meant to say that when an AI vibe coded project beyond some complexity it's difficult for a human coder to…
The problem is the _way_ AI will solve an AI bug. I've seen the loop countless times. There's a creeping complexity and brittleness that creeps in over time as more and more complexity is left purely to the LLM agent. It will become unsustainable without a human understanding and making course corrections at some point.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's the neat part, when it's vibed it works, until it doesn't and then it's really hard to make it work again.
> when it's vibed it works, until it doesn't and then it's really hard to make it work again Is it? People have solved AI bugs with AI. If some vibe project eventually hits some bug and stops working, what exactly stops using AI to fix it? Is the idea that bugs will go beyond the limits of AI capability? If you meant to say that when an AI vibe coded project beyond some complexity it's difficult for a human coder to…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
How much time have you spent with Fable? We're in new territory here. It does not create messes.
>this time it’s different! Same thing people claim every time a new model is released, yet never seems to be true.
Do they still make mistakes? Sure. So do humans, though, so it would be unrealistic to expect perfection. The question is: does Fable make fewer mistakes than the median human coder? And at this point I'm genuinely not sure anymore.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If humans can find (and have been finding for millennia) new proofs for well posted math problems, I see no reason why they shouldn’t be able to implement a more performant fully featured version of an existing interpreter.
They can, and they have been doing so. But humans are expensive. Especially smart humans.
It will be interesting to see how cheap they can make it long term.