Live data from Hacker News

The bottleneck might be the air in the room

blog.mikebowler.ca

351–360 of 499 posts

Re: The bottleneck might be the air in the room

#351

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Take it outside, as long as it measures 400-450 it's probably good. Metrology calibration is necessary if you want accuracy better than 10%, but most of us don't care at all about that, instead we care about increments of 200ppm or more.

Haha yes. 400-450ppm is fine. We’re doing just fine here. Everything is okay. https://www.co2levels.org/

The comment was about the accuracy of the sensor, not about raising CO2 levels across the globe.

Re: The bottleneck might be the air in the room

#352
post #6

I really wish a Apple or another major OEM would integrate CO2 monitor into watches or smartphones. Suddenly, everybody would be aware of the CO2 level in the room, get alerts, etc. and the problem will just solve itself. There are so many rooms, classrooms, movie theaters and other places with poor ventilation where you just feel dizzy, or fall asleep, not knowing it was just due to lower oxygen levels in your blood…

> I really wish a Apple or another major OEM would integrate CO2 monitor into watches or smartphones

CO2 levels are locally elevated in the area where you exhale. Someone sitting at a desk with their hands on a keyboard exhaling through their nose would be producing a directed stream of elevated CO2 straight at the sensor on their wrist. Same thing if someone puts their phone on their desk.

Even with the IKEA and other cheap sensors that are becoming popular, there is a learning curve where users discover that putting it on their desk right in front of where they’re breathing produces higher numbers than having it even 5 feet away.

The false positives from having a CO2 sensor that close to everyone’s face would be causing unnecessary alarm all over.

> There are so many rooms, classrooms, movie theaters and other places with poor ventilation where you just feel dizzy, or fall asleep, not knowing it was just due to lower oxygen levels in your blood. Raising awareness is the only real solution.

If someone is falling asleep in this many different places I would suspect undiagnosed sleep apnea or another condition first and foremost. Spaces like movie theaters have very high volumes of air due to their size and commercial building HVAC has much higher standards for air circulation than even your home. If someone was falling asleep in so many different places then the most likely common theme is that person and it should be checked out!

This is another reason why putting CO2 sensors on everyone’s wrists would be a mistake: It would start getting blamed for every vague condition people experience. This has already happened with wrist-worn heart rate monitors. My friends in the medical field see people all the time who come in with vague complaints and they’ve self diagnosed as being related to their heart because they can see their heart rate now.

You also have the wrong idea about what elevated CO2 does. It doesn’t reduce the oxygen levels in your blood. It makes it more difficult for your body to expel CO2, which can produce subtle changes in many processes.

Re: The bottleneck might be the air in the room

#353
post #6

I really wish a Apple or another major OEM would integrate CO2 monitor into watches or smartphones. Suddenly, everybody would be aware of the CO2 level in the room, get alerts, etc. and the problem will just solve itself. There are so many rooms, classrooms, movie theaters and other places with poor ventilation where you just feel dizzy, or fall asleep, not knowing it was just due to lower oxygen levels in your blood…

> I really wish a Apple or another major OEM would integrate CO2 monitor into watches or smartphones CO2 levels are locally elevated in the area where you exhale. Someone sitting at a desk with their hands on a keyboard exhaling through their nose would be producing a directed stream of elevated CO2 straight at the sensor on their wrist. Same thing if someone puts their phone on their desk. Even with the IKEA and oth…

> CO2 levels are locally elevated in the area where you exhale.

That's the same area we inhale from... Wouldn't be right to measure there then? It's not like we're interested in the amount of CO2 on the ground (in this discussion)

Re: The bottleneck might be the air in the room

#354
post #6

I really wish a Apple or another major OEM would integrate CO2 monitor into watches or smartphones. Suddenly, everybody would be aware of the CO2 level in the room, get alerts, etc. and the problem will just solve itself. There are so many rooms, classrooms, movie theaters and other places with poor ventilation where you just feel dizzy, or fall asleep, not knowing it was just due to lower oxygen levels in your blood…

> I really wish a Apple or another major OEM would integrate CO2 monitor into watches or smartphones CO2 levels are locally elevated in the area where you exhale. Someone sitting at a desk with their hands on a keyboard exhaling through their nose would be producing a directed stream of elevated CO2 straight at the sensor on their wrist. Same thing if someone puts their phone on their desk. Even with the IKEA and oth…

The air infront of you IS the air you breed in, why shouldn’t it be measured?

Re: The bottleneck might be the air in the room

#355
I'm in the indoor air quality business. This is real.

A good way to think about CO2 is as a proxy for dirty air. CO2 is easy to measure but what it really means:

The next breath you take has: - already been inhaled and exhaled by others several times. - contains remnants of their farts, burps, off-gasing from everything they are wearing, have, everything in the room, etc. - may have presence of other gases like radon in the winter, mold spores, g-d knows whatever else. - co2 itself has negative effects but mainly it's a signal of what else is probabilistically in your air, poor ventilation.

Florence nightingale the inventor of modern nursing wrote that making indoor air as close as possible to outdoor air (without freezing the patient) is the best and most overlooked input to wellness. I believe this is still true.

Weirdly there are people who for some reason are hell bent on denying the air quality as an input to health and cognition. The simplest way to reason about it is: the argument for organic food is the less toxin-like stuff in it the better. Same for filtered or spring water. We often fail to quantity the impact exactly but we (logically) know that less toxin is better. For some reason we hold a much higher bar for "blaming the air" which doesn't make sense.

By volume we consume exponentially more air than food or water, and it enters the blood stream faster and more directly so obviously it impacts us. The EPA ranks indoor air quality as a top risk.

Ironically we are obsessed with outdoor air quality and if you have allergies to things like pollen that's a real concern but in most cases outdoor air is the baseline for what's indoors + other shit is added.

I find that there are people who say "wow air quality here is bad" and there are people who say "oh man I'm tired lately" without being able to attribute it, but I don't ever see anyone thriving in what is objectively bad air.

Re: The bottleneck might be the air in the room

#356

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I really wish a Apple or another major OEM would integrate CO2 monitor into watches or smartphones CO2 levels are locally elevated in the area where you exhale. Someone sitting at a desk with their hands on a keyboard exhaling through their nose would be producing a directed stream of elevated CO2 straight at the sensor on their wrist. Same thing if someone puts their phone on their desk. Even with the IKEA and oth…

> CO2 levels are locally elevated in the area where you exhale. That's the same area we inhale from... Wouldn't be right to measure there then? It's not like we're interested in the amount of CO2 on the ground (in this discussion)

No, because the studies that establish the levels correlated with cognitive changes use ambient CO2 levels. Not with a stream of air directed, maybe, from your nose to your wrist.

It is not possible to come up with a different baseline for wrist-worn monitors because the measurements could change significantly based on even small factors like the position of the wrist or smartphone.

Re: The bottleneck might be the air in the room

#358

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s the point of this thread that each device would have a small sensor that would sync and aggregate with others in the room

I think the thread established that CO2 sensors are too bulky for that.

So were most other sensors before Apple (and their suppliers) miniaturised the sensors. Gps and imu was huge in the 90s, several pound each.

Re: The bottleneck might be the air in the room

#359

I'm in the indoor air quality business. This is real. A good way to think about CO2 is as a proxy for dirty air. CO2 is easy to measure but what it really means: The next breath you take has: - already been inhaled and exhaled by others several times. - contains remnants of their farts, burps, off-gasing from everything they are wearing, have, everything in the room, etc. - may have presence of other gases like radon…

Sorry forgot the thing most directly related to the article. Harvard did a study on air and cognition (Google Harvard cogfx) - here's the Gemini summary which tracks with my research:

Study 1 (Simulated Office): Participants in optimized "Green" and "Green+" office environments scored 61% and 101% higher, respectively, on cognitive function tests compared to conventional office environments.

Study 2 (Buildingomics): In a real-world analysis, occupants of high-performing, green-certified buildings had 26% higher cognitive scores and slept better than those in high-performing but uncertified buildings.

Home/Work Study: Researchers tracking remote workers found that suboptimal indoor temperatures and elevated CO₂ (indicating poor ventilation) directly harmed creative problem-solving and cognitive processing.

Re: The bottleneck might be the air in the room

#360
post #354

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I really wish a Apple or another major OEM would integrate CO2 monitor into watches or smartphones CO2 levels are locally elevated in the area where you exhale. Someone sitting at a desk with their hands on a keyboard exhaling through their nose would be producing a directed stream of elevated CO2 straight at the sensor on their wrist. Same thing if someone puts their phone on their desk. Even with the IKEA and oth…

The air infront of you IS the air you breed in, why shouldn’t it be measured?

Because the thresholds everyone gets from the studies were not measured in that location.

It would be like the weather station telling you it was 160 degrees outside because they put their thermal sensor on the asphalt, but you wanted to know the air temperature.

Post reply on HN