Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says
71–80 of 299 posts
Re: Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anthropic stole the entire internet. Excuse my language, but they can fuck right off.
The issue here is not whether Anthropic used Common Crawl, Alibaba also does that. The issue is that by distilling Claude, Alibaba reuses the IP anthropic used to train the model that's more akin to historical Chinese reverse engineering methods and disrespect of IP
Re: Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
It seemed pretty mild compared to what's collected by modern websites and apps, though? How many don't know your Timezone?
> How many don't know your Timezone? The timezone fetch was to alter program behaviour at runtime, not to send arbitrary timezones for tracking reasons. It was one way of detecting if it was a chinese person using the program and then behaving differently. Malware behaves this way. STUXNET for example was wired to do nothing except propagate unless the environment had the right conditions.
Most services I know that are trying to block abuse do collect device info
Re: Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says
#74[flagged]
Instead the AI companies reached these absurd settlements with publishers that made a mockery out of all the previous copyright enforcement victims.
Re: Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
> How many don't know your Timezone? The timezone fetch was to alter program behaviour at runtime, not to send arbitrary timezones for tracking reasons. It was one way of detecting if it was a chinese person using the program and then behaving differently. Malware behaves this way. STUXNET for example was wired to do nothing except propagate unless the environment had the right conditions.
The article on HN only said that they seemed to be collecting this to detect resellers. How else did the behavior change? Most services I know that are trying to block abuse do collect device info
Re: Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says
#76Re: Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anthropic stole the entire internet. Excuse my language, but they can fuck right off.
The issue here is not whether Anthropic used Common Crawl, Alibaba also does that. The issue is that by distilling Claude, Alibaba reuses the IP anthropic used to train the model that's more akin to historical Chinese reverse engineering methods and disrespect of IP
Also, you can't copyright AI outputs. So worst case they violated the ToS.
Re: Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
The article on HN only said that they seemed to be collecting this to detect resellers. How else did the behavior change? Most services I know that are trying to block abuse do collect device info
regardless of anything else, whether what you said is true or not: blocking program execution based on the detected environment is a runtime behaviour change.
Re: Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says
#79All remote AI are a massive security risk for individuals/companies/governments that may be targeted by the US government. It is likely that the US will get a live feed from each AI provider that they are inspecting in real time to identity things of interest, terrorist attacks or foreign government planning or even foreign companies competitive to key US companies. It will give them access to the though process in t…
Re: Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
The corollary is that there are no morals once the stakes are in the $ billions, let alone hundreds of billions. This isn't even about a single person or personality. Very few people in such position could stand fast by their moral code. In any case, an environment that favors profit above everything will naturally select for individuals who are unencumbered by such hindrances. There might've been 100s of Altmans and…
Copyright law is an artificial legal construct, not a moral code. I think appropriate attribution is a moral code, but I am not able to attribute every idea I have to all those who helped me develop the general intelligence that I use to develop such ideas.